70 mph vs 65 mph

Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by The Breeze, Mar 9, 2008.

  1. notarps4me

    notarps4me Road Train Member

    10,311
    5,253
    Jan 1, 2007
    NASA HQ
    0
    I am starting to think that we drive for the same company.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Skunk_Truck_2590

    Skunk_Truck_2590 Road Train Member

    2,093
    683
    Feb 16, 2007
    Stonewall, LA.
    0
     
  4. The Breeze

    The Breeze Light Load Member

    103
    28
    Feb 24, 2008
    Fayetteville, NC
    0
    Point well taken Bear, but I see you admit that every 700+ mile trip I have I am in fact losing out. Why do you assume I don't drive a full 11 every day I can? I'm burn'n daylight if I'm able but don't.

    I do not fault them one ioda for doing this to save money. I just wanted an honest examination of what a driver loses in this situation. Let's face it, being paid by the mile is an incentive based pay. The more I drive - the more money I make. However, if I was paid based on how fuel efficient my truck is, I would drive 55 every time it was feasible. Perfectly reasonable for an OO to base his profits on that.

    Depends on how you define barely I guess... I know it's anecdotal but, the last week that I was at 70 I picked up a load in Lavonia GA to Memphis. Another company driver at the same place loaded about an hour before me with that much of a head start. I passed him just before Tupelo and beat him by about 15 mins to the dock where he had to wait another 30 for me to get unloaded and another hour for their lunch break. He was still standing there when I left.

    I have to respectfully disagree sir. My paycheck is paper and when it says I'm losing money, I assure you I am loosing money. Look, a slower truck means a slower rate of pay. There are only so many hours in a log sheet that I can drive, and at the end of the day, it's the same amount of hours logged with fewer miles driven. I would concede to you if I were driving from IL to the northeast often but my region is the southeast. Please note the start of this thread where I'm talking about trips from MS to TX and back. Often times I'm averaging trips at 67mph even tho on paper- my safety dept won't allow me to log it over 65!

    Now, a trip from Moss Point MS to Hope Mills NC took me 10.5 hours. 715 miles:

    [​IMG]

    That trip took me home. If I did that same trip now, I would run out of hours just 25 miles shy of being home and have added an extra 10 hour break to my week. That's another 10 hours away from home that I don't get paid for.

    Well, as far as spreadsheets go I'm sure there are exponentials that can never really be accounted for. I mean here I have real data that shows a 5mph decrease in speed with a 7mph actual loss. Sticking with my perspective of hours, there are only so many in a day, that 2857 miles I did in 58 hours at 7.6mpg saved my company around 218 dollars at the pump. Great for them! Compared with my previous hourly average, I lost 162 dollars this past week. So I guess in certain spread sheets, my time is not a factor in this loss or gain calculation. Is that what it is?

    Yes, I understand. When times are tough we all have to bite the bullet. Just please don't deny that a drivers pay is affected by this. As long as you pay drivers by the mile - that will continue to be our only incentive and cutting our speed is a disincentive. Or, an incentive to find something better.
    :biggrin_25517:
     
  5. dancnoone

    dancnoone "Village Idiot"

    9,922
    3,713
    May 6, 2007
    Mississippi
    0
    A lot more must be taken into consideration for switching jobs, other than the speed of your truck.

    I agree, we all loose money when they turn them down. But, if you was never able to get 3000 miles a week to begin with. What's the differance now? Other than an additional hour or two driving each week.

    I swapped jobs last year. Along with that swap, come a .03 a mile cut in pay and 7 mph slower truck.

    What did I get for my trouble? About $200 more a week in income, and 2-3 days a week at home, instead of 4-5 days every 6-8 weeks. A #### good trade on any day, in anybodies book..
     
  6. firecracker24

    firecracker24 Bobtail Member

    47
    4
    Feb 18, 2008
    lakeland,florida
    0
    sure driving 70mph is nice especially to pass certain four wheelers but it is also nice to not worry about speeding tickets.I have driven both kinds of trucks with and without the limiters and for some reason I always find myself late and feel that I need to go as fast as the truck will go.guess its in the family we all have lead feet!!
    now with the fuel prices the way they are I find that it really helps to go 55 in some areas since it can boost my mpg up to around 7 or 8.(in a freightliner century) but as soon as I hit 65 mpg my mpg drops to around 5. big difference.
    always consider the ups and downs of limiters,I know it will be hard to get used to but right now every cent counts.
     
  7. The Breeze

    The Breeze Light Load Member

    103
    28
    Feb 24, 2008
    Fayetteville, NC
    0
    Thanks for all of the input from you guys on my situation. Just to update things, I quit.

    I found another company that runs their trucks at 72 and pays hub miles.

    I'm in a much better situation even before my previous employer started fiddling with things. Again, I don't blame them for doing what they had to do to cut costs. I found my self in the same predicament when my paycheck got cut forcing me to look else where to improve things.

    I'm going to miss my dispatcher. We had actually become personal friends. I left with no hard feelings on either side.

    Oh, did I mention that I'll be home more now?
    :biggrin_25525:
     
  8. 2xR

    2xR Medium Load Member

    365
    94
    Dec 12, 2006
    Ol' North State
    0
    I see the disincentive worked for you. Congrats! I, too, have ran heavy in the Southeast, especially the I-10 corridor. Honestly, a 72mph truck is a bit too slow on those routes. Maybe cruise at 72, but give me a couple more if I need to hurry up and pass on a certain bridge in Lousy-Anna.
    [​IMG]

    If a company can't afford to operate the trucks, as they were designed to operate, due to the cost of fuel and maintenance, then the shipper should have to ante up whatever it takes to move the freight. Eventually the cost would be spread among all the consumers, the way it should be. Balancing the entire system on the back of just the truck operators seems a bit one-sided and is an unfair burden.
     
    The Breeze Thanks this.
  9. Roadmedic

    Roadmedic Road Train Member

    18,951
    8,979
    Apr 4, 2007
    0
    Enjoy it while it lasts.

    I expect to see one of two things happen:

    1. All the companies drop the speed down.

    2. Return to the 55 mph speed limit with the trucks governed accordingly.
     
  10. cluck-cluck

    cluck-cluck Light Load Member

    73
    8
    Apr 8, 2008
    walnut ridge, ar.
    0
    I agree with both points. I was a little young but looks sort of like the 70,s again.

    As far as a company not being able to afford to run 72. Looking at it from a money standpoint a company will make more money, in most instances, governing their trucks at 62 to 65. And money is why they are in business anyway. They could care less how long it takes to pass while they are setting at their desk.
     
  11. Roadmedic

    Roadmedic Road Train Member

    18,951
    8,979
    Apr 4, 2007
    0

    The truck would be costing less in the fuel. It will also cost less per hour due to the lower speed for driver pay.
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.