2000 hart 7 cc vs 2008 wally mo 7 cc

I've only seen one Hart up close but all I could think of was how many loads you would have to turn down bc of the poor design. If those are your only two options then the wally mo for sure

 

Naw you want more hydraulics for sure. You'll be glad you have them when you're not bottoming out cars on the upper deck breakover angle

 

Hmmm. Well that is actually the best looking Hart that I've seen lol. Still though I would recommend the Wally Mo. Not only will pay for itself with better loads, if you keep your equipment in good shape the Wally Mo will really hold its value. Have had friends that have run them for a couple years and sell them for close to the same price lol

 

I wish I had more suggestions but I can't think of anything other than keep calling agents. I know a guy in GA that uses the same agent as I do in KY so maybe give them a call to see if they can write FL policies? Worth a shot anyway: http://www.aatruckinsurance.com/

 

That Hart may not be bad if it is still solid. But both are over priced for their age. Cannot imagine a bank wanting to finance more than 2 or 3 years on either due to age. They have to be able to recoup their money if you default.

Your insurance is higher due to several factors, but one major is with FL as your home or base State. At least years ago that was the case for car haulers insurance rates down there.