Thank you....I'll google Q carriers and see what I can come up with. And in the order for the DAC it says they'll call and go over it with you....so if they think I can fight to have it changed to only include the word "incident" ....which is how the company reported it....they a fight with DAC I will have......
-And I don't blame you for not reporting it. I was and always have been to honest (if there is such a thing).....I refuse any system to cause me to be dishonest.
-That said, I sure as #### don't blame anyone else for lying their ### off in a situation like these.....
jacked up DAC!!!!
Discussion in 'Motor Carrier Questions - The Inside Scoop' started by Faber, Oct 24, 2008.
Page 2 of 5
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-But they do go by your DAC and I was also told later that "they view incidents as the same as accidents."
-The odd thing is that so does the company I just left (per orientation), but now I'm told that ,"they have my company record reported as only showing incidents- no accidents. And that's what they repport to DAC.'
-My understanding is that if you have a "preventable incident"...the company you work for has to report any "preventables" and they may view it as an incident....BUT when DAC gets the record, because it is listed as "preventable".....DAC changes it to the term, "Non-DOT reportable preventable incident/accident."
I applied at a over size company near here today, talked to them, and they wanted me to apply....saying, "they don't care about incidents, they care about accidents." But (as stated by a previous poster), they are a smaller company.
I called a larger company also and their response was, "If -insert company name here- will send us a letter stating that they view your record as incidents and not accidents."
Conclusion so far;
-If you want to get on to a good larger company, don't have "incidents"
-If you want to get on a average larger company- get a letter saying you only had "incidents."
-Smaller companies may be concerned with your MVR and pay no attn. to your DAC.
-If the DAC fighting agency says, 'Your previous employer says you only have 'incidents' and DAC call them 'accidents,' that's misrepresenation and we should fight it.'.....then that's what I'll do.
-If they say,'Incidents and accidents are the same as far as DAC is conserned.' Then I'll say O.K., and go on looking for a job where someone is more interested in my squeeky ### clean MVR.
-Hope this helps and I'll keep ya updated. My advice is to take bumping a fence as serious as running over a car....doesn't sound right, does it?
Maybe I'll say, "Screw it, I blew my chance, I'm not driving for some #### company- and I'm going to get a local job and bang my wife at night and spend time with my kid."
Anyone got advise for my current situation, including that I have the ability to purchase a truck outright in the scenario?Last edited: Oct 27, 2008
-
Sorry if that whole thing was confusing....ask any questions and I'll try to explain the crap I've found out differently.
-Remember that any of this is subject to change, as I've found out....and I'll repost any useful info. if I get any. -
B$%g your wife and spend time with your kid. This is always better then spending the night at a truck stop. Nothing like stepping in a puddle of pi#s before getting back into your truck. Also, dont report dings or dents or scraps because it is the insurance companies that rule. We all make mistakes and being perfectly honest works both ways. The companies are far from perfectly honest and waste plenty of our time which is all we really have. When you report an "incident" you simply cut your own throat. It shouldnt be that way. A driver shouldnt be threated with loosing his livelihood because he dinged a header board or scraped a bumper on a fence. We are all view as "points and risk factor" by insurance companies to the point of insanity. Truckermario on here overshot his fifth wheel when backing up and put a small ding in his refer unit and was fired after he honestly reported it and he had only been driving at the company for a week. Its just not worth it.
-
Maybe its just best to get your own truck, your own trailer, and your own authority and just go with it, at least the evil DAC empire and the trucking company senate that fuels them wont hurt your lively hood then. Its all up to you at that point
Faber Thanks this. -
-
-You know, anything I damaged would have been replaced on the company dime out of parts and not needed to be reported to insurance, yet, your statement about insurance companies still reigns true....as another poster said he heard the insurance companies were claiming that those on probation were a liability....and there it is. I can run 2yrs. 200,000 miles, and run my ### silly as a stupid rookie, start out in the winter as a rookie, and get in and out of these ###### up shippers and recievers like everyone else....never damage anything that wasn't companies....and I'm a liability more then say a guy that just got out of school with no experience....ain't that nice. (which any rookie has to get his shot....but speaking from a insurance persons view). Ah...so it goes....on with the show. -
If times werent so tough on companies they wouldnt necessarily have to nitpick the way they do about every little thing. Course your still going to have the bad apples like your Swift, Werner, CR England, Stevens, TransAm, etc, etc, but they just wont be as sour if business is booming especially if all the driver did was scrap up a fender and nothing else.
Faber Thanks this. -
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 2 of 5