My load got wider

Discussion in 'Flatbed Trucking Forum' started by Gumper, Oct 22, 2018.

  1. Hurst

    Hurst Registered Member

    6,618
    12,266
    Aug 24, 2011
    Tampa, Fl
    0
    Pulling step deck, I dont use my pipe stakes often,.. but they are better to have and not need than to need and not have.

    Hurst
     
    PoleCrusher and beastr123 Thank this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. kylefitzy

    kylefitzy Road Train Member

    4,731
    19,699
    Aug 12, 2007
    Kansas city,Mo
    0
    Saying you can’t permit a divisible load is correct but confusing. If that load could be “divided” and then be legal dimensions it’s considered divisible.

    Another clearer way to say it is you can not create an over dimensions load. Like this one loading two 5’ pieces next to each other.

    I understand what you’re saying because I do it too. Loading multiple pieces with one or all being oversize. A multiple piece load is not the same as divisible.
     
    Oxbow and bacoman Thank this.
  4. REALITY098765

    REALITY098765 Road Train Member

    1,519
    1,349
    Sep 17, 2017
    0
    To the shipper--Can you weld a couple brackets on to connect those pieces?
    Not that I have ever done that.
     
    1951 ford Thanks this.
  5. Rontonio

    Rontonio Road Train Member

    6,442
    47,422
    Aug 9, 2009
    0
    You cannot permit a divisible load load for width if the side by side loading causes an over width condition or increase the width.

    That is why states ask the question loaded or towed

    Then ask loaded single or side by side.
    You cannot load a 4’ wide piece next to a 6’ wide piece and permit for 10’ width ...
     
    m16ty, TripleSix, cke and 3 others Thank this.
  6. Hurst

    Hurst Registered Member

    6,618
    12,266
    Aug 24, 2011
    Tampa, Fl
    0

    In that type of situation yes you are correct.

    But the blind statement that you can not permit divisible loads for width is not true.

    Hurst
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2018
    RollinThunderVet Thanks this.
  7. bacoman

    bacoman Bobtail Member

    27
    57
    Sep 5, 2017
    0
    I guess that more clarity is reuired for some here. The load pictures posted by the OP were of a divisible load that cannot be permitted for width.
     
  8. Gumper

    Gumper Road Train Member

    1,579
    3,845
    Jan 7, 2018
    Butte, MT
    0
    In Montana raw logs can be 9’ wide. Something I read in their oversize load regulations. Bringing it through Idaho I was not legal even with the permit like is discussed. It happened though, and I will not do it again. In the situation I was in I chose to risk it since I was already rolling down the road before it became an issue.
     
    Hurst and cke Thank this.
  9. Oxbow

    Oxbow Road Train Member

    13,407
    138,983
    Nov 24, 2015
    Idaho
    0
    And the blind statement that you can permit any divisible load for width is equally untrue.
     
    TripleSix, 4mer trucker, SAR and 2 others Thank this.
  10. Hurst

    Hurst Registered Member

    6,618
    12,266
    Aug 24, 2011
    Tampa, Fl
    0

    Except that I included examples when I made that statement.

    Maybe read more than the first line go take a class on the English language.

    Hurst
     
    dngrous_dime Thanks this.
  11. Oxbow

    Oxbow Road Train Member

    13,407
    138,983
    Nov 24, 2015
    Idaho
    0
    Oh, so I forgot to include examples. I stand corrected.(I can include as many as you like).
     
    4mer trucker and SAR Thank this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.