Beware crooked Mercer!

I said no such thing. I asked a very simple question that you refused to answer twice now. I indicated no judgement on either parties part. I do begin to get suspicious of people's motives when they deflect the question then make allegations against the person asking it.

So for the third time, you were offered a load at a specific rate. Were you paid that amount or not?

Yes?

No?

 

And yet you didn't. At least not the case number you gave. You are a defendant in that case.... The most you have is a counter claim for breach of contract.
Too bad the court doesn't make public documents that should be public.
Unless you have a different court case where you actually did sue them.....

 

I was with mercer 7 years and did very good.Im likely going back soon.

 

Looks like Mercer is in the hot seat in this case. When a court subpoenas files you have to follow those instructions TO THE LETTER-like it or not! Nobody wants to run afoul of a judge and get a possible contempt of court charge,which is what is happening here(most courts-civil and criminal alike believe in FULL DISCLOSURE,unless the judge issues a gag order or orders such files sealed). As far as the judge is concerned Mercer is withholding evidence that shows the OP was telling the truth about his counterclaim(and Mercer’s false claim).

 

Not necessarily. Some judges like to legislate from the bench. They forget their job is to interpret law, not write it.

 

Case isnt over and no docs available yet so not possible to know either way yet except what op is saying.

 

In this case the judge may be following the rules.

 

Well I found the case file. The next hearing is scheduled for January 28th,2020. Naturally like most of circuit clerk offices you have to pay to find out what went on. But I’ll give the OP the benefit of a doubt.

KYeCourts - Login