What will be the advantages and disadvantages going from 3.42 to 3.73? On Volvo D16 535hp with Eaton Ultrashift plus 18 speed, currently with 22.5’s running 76mph @ 1600rpm’s.
3.42
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by Abusumeyo, Jul 20, 2012.
Page 5 of 5
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
3.73 would be better out of the hole. Make it easier to get heavy loads rolling and less strain on the driveline (especially on an uphill) vs a 3.42 ratio.
3.73 will increase the cruising RPM. May or may not have a noticeable impact on fuel economy. All depends on how much load you're putting on the engine.bonous Thanks this. -
-
-
Thanks a lot for your time! Very much appreciated! -
Those 2.XX ratios will probably be pushing it.
-
I know this is a old thread .
I have a 2013 pete 388 with 550 hp ,1850 torque , 18 speed Eaton, 3.42 rears . It's a 70 " standup sleeper dbl framed back half of truck . 46k drives , holland fw35 5th wheel , AirTrac suspension . I have a Muncie dual line wet kit . I'm interested in pulling a 55 ton trail king hydraulic rgn. Do you think this set up will work or do I need to swap for 3:90 rears . -
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 5 of 5