I know an expense they could cut and possibly avoid that move altogether--turnover costs. According to another poster here, that expense is ultra-high, and I'm sure it is. This makes it even more of mystery why it's allowed, especially when stock holders clamor so much about costs they actually cut the pay of new drivers.
Wait, I know. If they did cut their turnover, they'd not be able to suck the government sugar titty.
A JB Hunt paycut question
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by grunntly, Apr 22, 2008.
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2