Anyone else get a class action form about DAC/HireRight lawsuit?

What did the HireRight letter say ?, that's 1 violation right there what's the date on the service of the letter.

 

Ctops I sent you a pm

 

What part of what I said "sounds like a union driving job"?
Why do you feel the need to condescend and "explain employment with common carriers promises at hire in"?
And NO; "promises of NO TOUCH" isn't (always a lie). Neither is "guaranteed home time". If you aren't getting it, you're working for the wrong company.
Why would you think that THEY (common carriers) are governed by the FCRA?

 

Just 20+ years of past experience, it don't matter anymore all this new regulation has broken the trucking industry to a point of no return.

 

I just requested my free copy from hireright-this should be interesting.

 

You must understand the novelty of this case, bad background reports are very common not just with truckers that being said it was very lucky Mr. Ryals prevailed on this suit, he was probably an owner operator and like many since post 9/11 regulation stared poring down the pipe, and when the TSA got involved for the haz-mat most drivers with background felony convictions that they could not expunge pretty much took their trucking careers away from them.

The ones that made it through that got whacked with the 5 dollar a gallon fuel, that year I read 4500 registered trucking co's went under. Mr. Ryals probably sold his truck and payed the attorneys to file the case (attorneys wont take "a case" as this on contingency) and payed at least $40,000 up front on a novelty case.

The attorneys for Mr. Ryals did some basic inquires to USIS/HireRight and learned there was no general counsel to deal at USIS/HireRight with and always this means it's run by greedy owners/managers that don't go by the rules and was very sloppy with their records and take most of the profits to a tax haven country, my guess is Mr. Ryals's attorneys knew after a year or so that USIS/HireRight could not produce a defense to a civil action, yea I have not seen the case files but it's simple really when you file an suit the defending party must produce discovery and I bet dimes to donuts USIS/HireRight shredded everything during the USIS-to-HireRight transition instead of burning down the joint, lol this is so typical of rich people that hate to use attorneys.

The class payout in this case seems to be covered by the class attorneys it's really their money by rights but not by rule, no attorneys within 500 miles from Richmond don't seem to be interested in taking my case yet, if I could show 10 violations I can guesstimate around 50 grand IF the attorneys does his job at this fairness hearing coming up. The class attorneys would pay-off any attorney that contacts them with a potential client with a 10 claim to file direct, yea I would pay off any potential complications with a few grand, done deal. /post/

 

No "general counsel" at USIS? Is that why OOIDA's lawsuit was thrown-out several years ago?

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

 

From my understanding we can only get up to 20 grand and nothing more

 

All these figures are a speculation made by the current class attorneys which are set to get 33 1/3 % of the class settlement.

After the fairness hearing in Nov. 2011 the trial judge will assign an administrator to disburse the class payouts (some attorney or law firm), as I said I posted adds in craigslist under services "legal" not one response. I will put together a direct claim by 10/20/11 with what I got but without counsel to argue my claim at the fairness hearing I'm screwed probably, judges HATE Pro Se litigants.

 

If some nice person would go to the Richmond VA. Fed. court house and get the clerk to pull the case file and call me there I need to review some specific documents I need to see if the 20 grand is a blatant lie from the class attorneys, ask yourself do attorneys lie over $$$ ?, PM me if interested. (2 weeks left).