Cheating on logs

Geez Roadmedic no wonder you hit a moose, obvious path through the firemen !

 

Here is another one in Wisconsin and the truck is the one that misses it and might have been struck in the rear.

http://wgntv.com/2013/12/09/video-multi-car-pileup-in-wisconsin-caught-on-traffic-cam/

 

I think Wal-Mart not only avoided the accident, but saved many others from being in the accident.

 

I agree.

But, I could not be sure, the car on the right rear might have clipped him. If so, it was not his fault, but accidents do happen beyond the control of the driver.

 

But they're not inevitable, so back to what I replied. Probably not the best way of thinking.

 

With all points considered, and all being justified in their respective opinion of driving "style"...one fact remains constant:

A driver can be in relative control of one, and only one aspect in operating in a defensive posture. The only position the driver can have a relative "control" of is the front aspect. As the aspect moves to either side and rear of the driver/vehicle being operated, "control" decreases. A driver cannot control the decisions and actions of any other vehicle, especially in a rearward aspect of the control vehicle, each side (right and left) has limited sight and an even greater corrective movement limitation from the primary driver. The true rear (behind the primary vehicle) has the greatest amount of "uncontrolability" to the primary vehicles operator.

The key to this proposition is the amount of a controllable factor the primary driver (you) can add to or equate from the surrounding aspects of each "situation".

 

So....you are intimating this thread might be considered for nomination of a HIJACK AWARD?