Dtb Radio

Yet, I don't what? I'm not saying he's guilty but I'll be ###### if I'm going to risk giving my money to a pederast. If he's found innocent than great but if he isn't and I knowingly gave him my business than I've helped a despicable person. Stop watching so much Dragnet. Innocent until proven guilty is law speak. It's for courts.

 

Talking out both sides of your mouth much come natural.

 

Very few criminal charges result in "no bond". Only if there is a threat of the defendant not showing up for court, or the crime is like mass murder or something. The prosecution has one year to bring a case to trial. If the defendant files motions and asks for continuances, that time can go on for a couple of years or more. He probably had money to bond, and money to hire a decent attorney. He will drag this out for as long as he can. He knows what happens to people like him in prison. I've seen this happen many times. I like Bill O'Rielly's Megan's Law, 25 years first offense, life for a second.....actually, life the first time would be better.

 

Sounds like you have too much skin in the game here. Are you a convicted sex offender? I have a feeling you've at least been accused of it.

 

This horse died on JULY 26 from the severe beating that left if in raw meat shreds. In other words let dead horses rest in peace.

 

No. But I do get a kick out of preying on weak minds that read stuff on the Internets and make informed opinions about hearsay.

I have no Skin in the game Jimmy, However I don't mind one darn bit pointing out the lunacy of folks that claim one thing then post another in the same thread.

It's simple. You either believe in the basic precepts of innocent until proven guilty or you don't. To bring 2nd amendment rights into this discussion was idiotic and without reason. I'm sure you won't understand reasoned intelligence so you get a free ride. I'm done.

 

Show me in the CONSTITUTION where INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY is stated? HINT: It's not there smart guy!


http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html

 

Your comprehension skills are lacking. I didn't say anything about the Constitution and guilt, I proposed that bringing the 2nd amendment into this discussion was ludicrous.

It is Law that the accused is innocent until proven guilty.

The Law and the Constitution are separate entities.

Go gather some education before you bring a set of brass knuckles to a ##### slap.

 

Presumption of Innocence
A principle that requires the government to prove the guilt of a criminal defendant and relieves the defendant of any burden to prove his or her innocence.

The presumption of innocence, an ancient tenet of Criminal Law, is actually a misnomer. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the presumption of the innocence of a criminal defendant is best described as an assumption of innocence that is indulged in the absence of contrary evidence (Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 98 S. Ct. 1930, 56 L. Ed. 2d 468 [1978]). It is not considered evidence of the defendant's innocence, and it does not require that a mandatory inference favorable to the defendant be drawn from any facts in evidence.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Innocent+until+proven+guilty

leon
kc0iv