I was wrong. E-logs save lives

Go ahead and believe what you’re told like a little sheeple.

Pretty obvious it’s not about safety when:
Fact 1. Carrier Safety record played now role in determining who needed the elog
Fact 2. The more trucks we get on elogs the more carnage there is
Fact 3. Mega officials are on record as saying it was done for clerical reasons

 

Youre not listening, I say pay attention, son. Am I not getting through that thick head of yours? *whacks you on the head with a baseball bat*

I am not trying to stop them. This discussion is not between me and the FMCSA. This is about correcting the assertion of SHEEPLE like yourself, that the Elog is for safety and that old trucks are driven only to get around E-logs. It's between Me and you and that other idiot that continues to propagate the lie that paper and old trucks are the cause of accidents. You see, you're really just a clueless truck driver spewing the BS that the ATA propaganda machine has published. This is because you're not, nor have you ever been, an employer of truck drivers and you have no idea what you are talking about.

What are you really that you don't know that term?

shee·ple
[SHēpəl]
NOUN
derogatory

1. people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.
   "by the time the sheeple wake up and try to change things, it will be too late"

ORIGIN
1940s: blend of sheep and people.

 

Now you are wrong, Jeezus what don't you guys get about this? READ for F sakes.

 

What's a new truck cost.....$150,000? $90k seems like the upper end but if that's a real number and everything on that truck has been gone through, it's still a better deal than a new one that costs 2x, is a maintenance nightmare and will need to be traded in three years. I would pay $90k for a new old truck AND RUN A ELOG before I bought a emission truck.

 

You have a real short memory you and I just talked about some of it yesterday LMMFAO. Read above Im not repeating myself