Need help understanding "New" codes in Paccar engine.

http://www.qulegal.com/15-08-28-17-PACCAR-Amended-Complaint.pdf

 

I bought my truck used (24 month old) and no, I could not return it (buyer beware) it was/is completely my fault for not educating myself. I tried to educate myself but the information i got was A LIE. Four months after buying my truck a class action suit was filed in Federal Court. A month after that, the Federal Government launched an investigation into Paccar's business practices (lying to perspective customers), again, completely my fault for trusting a company that my family had been loyal to for 50+ years (never again).
Daf, I understand your loyalty to the Paccar engine but you have to know that they are not being honest. Thats not the opinion of a few random anonymous posters on a trucking forum, that is the opinion of several highly paid attorneys (they would not accept this case if they didn't think they could win) it is also the opinion of the EPA and at least one Federal Judge. We'll see where this goes but one thing you and others should consider is this, if this is even partially true, Paccar will have destroyed its name in the U.S. forever and will take the once great names of Peterbilt and Kenworth with them. Those names are already destroyed in my book, and I'm sure with the tens of thousands of those who were lied to then abandoned by Paccar. http://www.qulegal.com/15-08-28-17-PACCAR-Amended-Complaint.pdf

 

Yes, as of Wednesday. Anyone can join, because they included this at the end of the list of complainants.. "
All Others Similarly Situated"

 

I appreciate your ideas and I don't want to sound like I am discounting them. Anyone who has worked on trucks as long as I (and it sounds like you as well) understands that there is ALWAYS an answer to EVERY problem on a truck. They would not put a truck on the road knowing that there will be problems from day one. That has been true for 100 years, so if a CEL comes on then a wire must have rubbed against something or a pin came loose in the ECM, maybe a hard part failed etc... But this is different, the lawsuit alleges that Paccar knows when they roll the truck off the assembly line that that truck has a defective ATS and ECM... The ONLY reason they would put that truck on a showroom floor anyway is because they know they can not find the issue (and 5 years later they have not). If the manufacturer can't find the problem, how can I find it? If you have completely fixed a Peterbilt with a Paccar engine and had no CEL's PLEASE tell me how you did it, better yet, send your resume' to Paccar because Im sure they would rather pay you a few million to fix this than the hundreds of millions they could be paying in the next few years if this lawsuit has legs.