Peterbilt 579 vs 587

Discussion in 'Peterbilt Forum' started by PolishPrince, Feb 23, 2017.

?

For Flatbed Peterbilt 579 or 587, both cummins

Poll closed Sep 23, 2017.
  1. Peterbilt 579

    72.7%
  2. Peterbilt 587

    27.3%
  1. Sportster2000

    Sportster2000 Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,480
    Thanks Received:
    886
    Location:
    Indiana
    0
    I can't really say. The 587 has a 600 hp ISX in it with an Eaton Ultrashift Plus. The 579 has a 12 liter Cummins and an 18 speed manual. Not really apples to apples there. On the other hand I will be driving a 579 with a 2017 ISX with a 13 speed manual tomorrow for work. I'll see what the dash tells me the fuel mileage is when I get done. I will reset it before I drive.
     
    Trucker61016 and PolishPrince Thank this.
  2. poppapump1332

    poppapump1332 Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,986
    Thanks Received:
    2,464
    Location:
    birdsboro,pa
    0
    A real American Classic is the 379 Pete!
     
  3. PolishPrince

    PolishPrince Light Load Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Messages:
    296
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Chicago
    0
    Yea... some day... but not for my first truck... the MPG would kill me...
     
  4. PolishPrince

    PolishPrince Light Load Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Messages:
    296
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Chicago
    0
    Im sitting on the edge of my seat!
     
  5. BoostedTeg

    BoostedTeg Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,871
    Thanks Received:
    3,570
    Location:
    Boise ID
    0
    Shouldn't you get you're cdl first then start looking at buying a new truck?
     
    steelcitytrucka Thanks this.
  6. Cat sdp

    Cat sdp . .

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2012
    Messages:
    21,305
    Thanks Received:
    76,212
    Location:
    Orion's Belt
    0
    You're to negative.......:)
     
    BoostedTeg and PolishPrince Thank this.
  7. PolishPrince

    PolishPrince Light Load Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Messages:
    296
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Chicago
    0
    Smart people research a long time before making a decision... jealous?
     
    MarkH129 Thanks this.
  8. Sportster2000

    Sportster2000 Road Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,480
    Thanks Received:
    886
    Location:
    Indiana
    0
    Alright, 500 hp 1850 lb ft torque. 3.23 rear end gear and a 13 speed. Eight foot trailer gap between the back of the truck cab and front of the trailer. Windy day. Regional haul (mix of interstate and state roads with in town driving) of 550 miles averaged out to be 6 mpg. If I wanted to get better fuel mileage I would have gotten the van trailer closer to the back of the truck. The truck also did not have the full areo package. It did have the top faring but no side fairings.
     
    MarkH129 Thanks this.
  9. PolishPrince

    PolishPrince Light Load Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Messages:
    296
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Chicago
    0
    Great! THanks for that info! Wish you the best!
     
  10. Scottyboy

    Scottyboy Light Load Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Messages:
    222
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Location:
    Kilgore Texas/Vilcabamba Ecuador
    0
    RESEARCH=QUESTIONABLE!
    EXPERIENCE=PRICELESS----------------------------JEALOUS?
     
    Steel Curtain Thanks this.