Real Deal on SWIFT/ DOT POLICY

I just recieved my DAC report after requesting it from USIS, so the write up i got goes as follows;
Contributed by; Swift Transportation WEB
phoenix AZ
orig data on 4/18/2007
period of service 11/2006 to4/2007
elig rehire NO
reason for leaving Discharge (or company terminated lease)
status co driver
equp used Dry van
loads hauled gen comm work record;company policy violation

thats the first page, then on the second page reads as follows
The following information on this driver has been provided by the motor carrier listed above. This information satisfies your driver background checks for this company under 49 C.F.R. part 391 for the period of service noted below. Information older than three years will not be included on this report.
period of service 11/2006 to 4/2007
DOT/alchol violation;Yes
test refusal
4/04/07
Driver refused a controlled substance or alchol test.

I did not refuse test, I went at the time the DM and I both agreed on, When I arrived they refused to even let me take the test saying I was 'Red Flagged". the DM lied about the agreement and refused to man up about his miscommunication about what took place on the phone. What i'm asking is the last part. IMFORMATION OLDER THAN 3 YEARS WILL NOT BE INCLUDED ON THIS REPORT........this april will be three years, does that mean I'll be able to reapply for OTR again, or if at least local work ??? Please only serious answers on this...... respectfully Michael Hill

 

ok wrong calculation, but does that mean that i'll be able to reapply for OTR again??? In my time i have never refused or tested positive for anything. well thats because I dont do anything period. SWift has messed up alot of peoples lives for their lies to DAC and to other companies.

 

yeah I've been a pro nearly 10 yrs now never a #### problem until SWIFT, now im fighting for my livelyhood and to get bills paid , i guess my next action is to state senate or even to Obama's office himself

 

I would like to know how long a company like SWIFT holds there records for reguarding DOT randoms ?? My situation has been almost two years now.... going to fight it non the less dispute what DAC has in there system as its one sided, noone ever contacted me on my version of what happened , to me thats a failure of a right to DUE PROCESS... later