I don't know if you're replying to my question about not having to take drug tests, but if you are, you would rather drive on the highways and interstates with people that are drunk and/or high? Because if there's no drug testing, anybody that is an alcoholic, and especially people that smoke marijuana, will push the boundaries, and end up driving while under the influence. Because they know they're going to be able to get away with it. I'd rather have stringent and strict drug testing policies and enforcement actions in order to keep people that have a problem with smoking marijuana and drinking alcohol from driving an 80,000 pound missile at 65-70 mph. That's just going to cause a whole lot of hell. I for one do not want to share the road with anyone that is drunk and/or high. Both of those have no business being in the trucking industry much less being allowed to be in use while driving down the highway.
Should yearly hair follicle testing be mandated as a condition of retaining CDL
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by nredfor88, Nov 25, 2022.
Page 4 of 12
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
If a driver pulls his brakes for the night at a Petro and decides to roll a fatty, why can't he? Why does some group of Nancy's get to decide what that driver is doing in his truck on his off duty time? IF regulation is good for one man, then all men should abide. If drivers have to pee in a cup, so should every occupation.
Seriously, if one person could come up with a legit reason that society would be better off if truckers were forced to pull out their own hair in order to obtain employment, I would be happy to oblige.
This is NOT about truckers or weed...it's about public compliance and the centralization of authority to dictate how you will spend this one life that you've awakened into.jason6541, TexasRiverRat, Rubber duck kw and 3 others Thank this. -
How about anyone that's every had a traffic violation of any kind should be banned from trucking?
How many ways can you think of that would discriminate against the exceptions in this world? -
Rubber duck kw, Gearjammin' Penguin and rch10007 Thank this.
-
-
That level of goverment control over the people is just not possible. Lets get rid of the moral aspect for a moment and just look at the practical problems.
As it stands, we cant keep heroin out of the prisons. Think about that for a second. We have total control over those degenerates and we cant keep them clean.
The fact is that there are not many of us that want to do drugs. Most drug seekers do not wish to work 70hrs a week. I dont think the problem of stoned drivers is as bad as you think it is and I dont think that success is the result of drug testing.
Are there a very few that get through and do drugs in a semi? I am sure there must be some.
Should we burn down the economy and the culture of freedom we have to eliminate them?
I dont think so.
I always vote for freedom over safetykemosabi49, Rubber duck kw and Gearjammin' Penguin Thank this. -
The other day, I was on facebook reading a comment to a question somebody asked about having to take a drug test as an O/O. The guy asking the question said that he had smoked a little weed recently within one month, and was worried about testing positive. There were a few people telling this person, whom was still a new driver, to buy synthetic urine and faking his drug test.Lennythedriver Thanks this. -
-
The Crossword Trucker Thanks this.
-
[QUOTE="chrismcallister34, post: 12223484, member: 335783" I can guarantee if weed was allowed to be in the trucking industry, at least 35-40% of truck drivers would start smoking weed while driving their semi. .[/QUOTE]
I dont think this is correctDave_in_AZ Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 4 of 12