Originally Posted by IDIeselman![]()
The F.C.C. has NO authority over free speech. There is NO BODY screaming "fire, fire!" in a crowded theater. The F.C.C. is merely to establish R.F. ORDER, it should never be considered a regulatory body, it just regulates licenses for businesses, that is as far as it should go, but we know better.
From shoving down Digital T.V. upon us, to draconian wiretapping, and a hostile distortions of the rules to attempt to increase their power, such as regulation of the Internet, selling off bandwidth space, etc. The corruption at the F.C.C. is as bad, if not worse than the good old buddy system at the ATF.
These clowns have got to go.The Constitution is clear, the freedom of speech is protected, but typical Government bureaucrats at the F.C.C. have different plans, and I think this is dangerous.
![]()
R.R. <<< NOTICE! <<<
E.A.
D.N.
.G.
.E.
.R.
If you quote someone, you should provide credit to the source of the quote.
__________________
This should concern ALL CB operators
Discussion in 'CB Radio Forum' started by Gadfly, Mar 18, 2011.
Page 2 of 4
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
blackw900
I like that Peterbilt ln your sig!!
I don't think that's a 250 Cummins in there . . .
Ted -
MD, what quote are you speaking of? Or are you referring to plagiarism?
Ted -
Guess what.... i think he's at it again, cause when i was in Merced 2weeks ago there was a base station walking on anyone. Sacramento has a couple of bases that do the same, as well as one out in Tracy.
-
12V71 Detroit (V-12)....Way fast!
-
I can't remember thw last time the FCC went after someone for " FREE SPEECH ".
Unless you really get vulgar they don't care ..... -
XPosTech, I can certainly understand Mad dog not noticing the R.D. as sufficing a signature or credit due to the writer of origin but, You obviously took great care to deliberately quote the page posted considerably earlier in the thread and not the one I had requoted in bold text to call notice of the writer to Mad Dog. It is obvious you done this to help make your misquided point and obvious failed attempt of trying to elevate yourself by discrediting another. Better luck next time!
"Plagiarism is taking the writings or literary ideas of another and selling and/or publishing them as one's own writing. Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism."
If there is anything else I can help you with don't hesitate to ask.
IDEeselman.Last edited: Mar 20, 2011
-
My bad.....I didn't notice that
-
I wouldn't think it is an issue of "free speech" per se. It is a matter of using an electronic device to enhance or enable the projection of communications to either a greater distance OR doing so in a manner that caused harm to others. That has be, to some degree, regulated to prevent interference and harm to essential communications. Wouldn't you certainly agree that using your CB radio IS an important communication in the conduct of your business either as a trucker, an individual citizen, OR even for pleasure?
The FCC that so many people HATE was not something that popped up on its own, but was created by Congress, an elected body, via the Communications Act of 1934. To this agency, Congress gave the authority to regulate radio and other electronic media on a nationwide basis. This was because of the NATURE of radio and its potential for good, and for harm to commerce aviation or emergency traffic.
I certainly don't agree with everything FCC does, but IF you did away with FCC, what would you replace it with? The very same things being regulated now would STILL have to be regulated. Are you talking about HOW FCC does their job being the issue? Or to what purpose would any new agency be devoted?
Radio and other electronic media such as TV, Cable would still have problems. CB radio would still have its problems, to wit, the one I cited above. There will always be "rambos" that think they can wrap themselves up in the Constitution and avoid punishment for causing problems for other users.
The whole point of this thread was NOT to cause trouble, but to point out the misconceptions about FCC and the rules governing CB radio. Some of us think you must in each and every case have a search warrant to inspect a CB (and any other) radio station. But the issue of "free speech" does NOT apply here (if that is what you are implying) because it is NOT speech that is being regulated in the instant case, but the USE of a CB radio in a manner that violates clear, long-established rules. The rules state that if you USE a CB radio, you MUST permit inspection It is the only way they can insure compliance. The mix-up often comes because people simply NEVER read Part 95 of the CB regulations to KNOW what they are talking about. They rely on myth, legend, and word of mouth for their info. And, thusly, people sometimes end up getting a big fine because they just don't know.
The use of a CB radio is voluntary, and has rules. If you USE a CB radio, according to Federal law, you must comply with the rules from the moment you pick up the mike. You don't HAVE to use a CB: it is optional and is NOT an "inalienable right". There's the misconception.
The facts presented here are just that: facts. Use 'em or forget about 'em. It's fine. No need for anger.
GF -
This should clear up any issues regarding copyright and plagiarism here.
Plagiarism & Copyright Warning
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 2 of 4
![[IMG]](proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetruckersreport.com%2Ftruckingindustryforum%2Fimages%2Fstyles%2Fdesert_green%2Fbuttons%2Fviewpost.gif&hash=0056b1689530f4fdab78b296cee37cdc)
