Well with all the crap that went down last week i guess they needed a scape goat and we ended up losing a really good guy, one who always took the time to listen to the drivers and address their needs as best as possible, a driver himself once, and a #### good one, who always went to bat for us. I wished he wouldn't have taken the job when they strong armed him into it, cause they always use that position, thankless as it already is, as a place to put the blame for all of ours inability to do one of the simplest tasks we are asked to do, to log correctly. And so they did.....the blame for the act lies with the managment, but the blame for the situation lies with each one of us.
We lost a good guy this last week...
Discussion in 'Watkins & Shepard' started by zmpart, Feb 22, 2013.
Page 1 of 3
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
A "good guy" maybe, but a useless one. Never had any respect for him. Sent him multiple QC msgs asking questions, to which he never even bothered to respond. Useless. Just seemed like a joke to me. Good riddance!
(ps I'm just guessing about who you are referring to.)Milktanker Thanks this. -
He was a really decent guy to get along with just talking to him but in the end he wasn't doing log audits the wAy he was supposed to and it ended up hurting the company big time with this audit. By doing that he pretty much guaranteed we will be on e-logs within the year. It is sad to see someone with that much experience with a company get fired because he is a good guy for the most part but unfortunately every place needs a scapegoat and unfortunately he was Watkins.
If the company isn't willing to correct the offenders then dot sure as h*** will step in and do it for them which is exactly what happened here. -
What was the initial to his first name??
-
So he wasnt informing you guys of violations? I know a lot of mistakes are done at scanning and it makes it look like I had a long list of violations but I only had one in 6 months and they need to be adressed and corrected. So u guys failed the audit? Just cuz someone is cool to talk to It dont mean hes doing his job.
-
Something similar happened at our carrier . While safety claimed nontolerance for HOS violations a small percentage of drivers could falsify the logs and get it past the safety department . They didn't fool the FMCSA auditor . The carrier has over 100 terminals but the corporate safety office wants to manage everything and control log auditing . I feel it would have been better for each of the hundred terminals to audit their own average 30 drivers than have one office try to audit over 3,000 drivers .
The carrier got nailed due to ignorance . They gave us Blackberrys that got pinged every 15 minutes when we were under load . The safety department never bothered to match Blackberry GPS locations with the driver logs . The auditor had a field day when he did that .
The consequences were all drivers were required to take several hours of online HOS training . The poor safety rating resulted in an INSPECT rating at scales which resulted in all PrePasses being redlighted and we are now on e-logs .sherlock510 and Milktanker Thank this. -
-
-
Haven't been here long but the guy never gave me a problem.
Maybe a QC here and there telling me to slow it down, on the west coast.
Oh well.... -
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 3