Also consider for large fleets like Swift, purchase price comes into play. Mack is probably gonna be a more expensive truck than a Frieghtliner or Int'l. Plus weights come into play as well. Mack is generally a heavy truck as they have always been a vocational HD kind of truck. Although Mack does have some OTR spec trucks these days it's hard to make a dent in a market that they haven't ever really been in with any kind of presence.
Mack has a LOT of trucks on the road, but they are not as visible. No one stops and looks twice at a garbage truck, or USPS truck or the country Roads truck.
What happened to Mack?
Discussion in 'Trucks [ Eighteen Wheelers ]' started by david07003, Nov 8, 2009.
Page 4 of 9
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
david07003 and LoneCowboy Thank this. -
Actually, from what I understand, in terms of pricing/willingness of dealer to haggle from high to low:
1. Int'l (the new lonestar commands a premium price)
2. Peterbuilt
3. Kenworth
4. Volvo
5. Western Star
6. Mack
My boss almost bought me an '09 Pete, but a Pete spec'd similar to my Mack was $124,000 and Pete wouldn't deal, we paid $112,500 for my '09 Mack, gave $8K trade-in on my '00 CH that I was driving (in fact Mack resold that CH two days after taking it on trade for $12,500). -
-
The amount the dealership is willing to "haggle" depends on the dealer, salesman and regional location. I can get a much better deal on a KW than I can on a Volvo or Mack. That has nothing to do with the PRICE, but my KW dealer will work with me on the price more than the local Mack dealer. At a dealer level all this is pretty dependant on the location and dealers a person is working with. -
It depends, Waste Managment ordered 15,000 new trash trucks from Mack last year, the order was handled through the 10 dealerships around the country. One local dirt hauler ordered 40 new daycabs from Mack a couple of years back, they went through the dealer. I agree it depends on the dealer, the KW and Pete dealers in my area won't haggle but the Mack dealer will to an extent. -
It sucks in a cross wind. My old truck was a 56" condo, if I was in a cross wind, other then feeling it blow I never knew it, with this one, the wind will get inside the roof fairings and whip around and cause the back of cab fairings on top top to shudder and rattle like crazy. -
As for weight, do you feel that it is too heavy compared to the rest that out there? -
wt. is totally dependent on how you order the truck Mack rears and trans. are heavier than Eaton, Meritors, ect. thus the reason you see other vendors trans and rears in a Mack, frame rail spec, wheel base, amoung other things but my Vision not super light but no heavier than other trucks I have. I think 56" flat top would be the way to go, its very hard to find a Mack with that bunk, looks better with out the fairings,
david07003 Thanks this. -
Mark
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 4 of 9