Hmmm. My 2 cents
I first started drivng a Volvo 670 with a Volvo d12 engine. No issues. I had the truck for 2 months. after, I was put into a Brand New Kenworth T660 with a Cummins 450. from 65 miles to 450,000 miles, I only had to replace 4 tires, oil, filters and 1 turbo. The turbo didn't fail, it was making a funning noise. Come to find out that the shaft was 10K of an inch out of round.
Oh. also when I first got the truck a cooler hose on the bunk wasn't put on and it blew off causing us to loose all coolant.
I now own a Volvo with a Cummins 500HP engine. I have replaced the turbo, brakes/radiator/AC condensor/brakes. The origh inal turbo is still good. I replaced it because several
Volvo dealers said it was my problem, but, it wasn't the problem.
So, I would say for me, I have had good luck with Cummins..
First Volvo was a 06 I think
Kenworth was an 08 - The truck has never wanted a manual regen.
Current Volvo 07.
I have heard of problems with 08 - 10 enginies. I think that is the 871 engine. I don't think the problems have been the engine, I think the problem has been the after treatment unit. issues with regen are what I have been hearing about.
Which is better engine -- Cummins or Volvo?
Discussion in 'Volvo Forum' started by stocktonhauler, Mar 15, 2013.
Page 4 of 4
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
All the engine manufacturers from 2008 to 2012 all had problems, all of them, pick your Lemon.
-
-
Well, I'd like to strap 4 Ford 2.3l engines together. You just can't kill those Pinto engines. LOL...
OK.. OK...
Cummins ISX 870 engine. No DPF..
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 4 of 4