My apologies. I reacted and responded to the first post.
It is very frustrating when people ask questions and put 0 info out for you.
To answer your question the Mack looks to be the better truck in my opinion.
The e7 350 are great on fuel and last forever.
Your opinion
Discussion in 'Flatbed Trucking Forum' started by biggi1996, Dec 1, 2017.
Page 2 of 3
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
The Freightshaker even has less miles apparently. -
Thanks to all you guys
-
What do you guys think of this truck?
1995 FREIGHTLINER FLD120 -
Shortwheelbase +spring ride = internal bleeding and pissing blood
-
Oxbow Thanks this.
-
You'll need to fuel a couple times/week with the small tanks. -
I'm not a big fan of Freightliner. They are a cheap truck IMO. Personally, I'd still go with the Mack.
All that being said, the main truck I drive is a '95 FL Classic. It's a ok truck but not Mack, KW, or Pete quality. I think the reason this truck is a decent truck is it's been babied since it was new.Oxbow Thanks this. -
About the whole fuel efficiency thing. It's absolutely the driver for most of it. I drove a RD Mack with an E7-350 and got 5 or so local. Another guy did the same with the same basic truck and he was getting 2. TWO!! He drove like a maniac and shifted at 2100 grabbing every gear even around the yard.
Oxbow Thanks this. -
Add to the fuel efficiency....
I drive an 03 mack 600, e7 350, 566,000 miles. Pulling a tanker picking up farm milk 88,000 gross weight.
Stop lights, two lanes, big hills, idling and im still getting 5.1- 5.3mpg.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 2 of 3