We are talking about 3". In most jurisdictions, in order to be cited you must be fully encroached, or addressed on the opposite side of the stop line. The width of the stop line is considered to be the reasonable margin of error.
I find it odd that your sig line "questioning the government" et al, et cetera ad nauseum, reads as it does, then you wax on about how you like seeing wolf packs operating...which, oh by the way, break more traffic laws than they enforce when they break the speed limit to leap frog in front of traffic to set up speed traps...er...special enforcement zones.
Hand held devices? Yep...absolutely. One of the last citations I wrote before I retired was to some snapperhead who was driving (steering with her elbow), texting on one phone while talking on another. But that's apples and oranges.
Running red lights and stop signs...yep, you betcha by golly. Have you any idea how many stop lines are set up in contradiction to the law in various municipalities?
And sorry...but "some", not "most" stop lines, as you claim, are set up to ease traffic flow, and especially not at a stop SIGN, rather than a stop LIGHT where a sensor in the stop line would actually be present. When is the last time you saw a stop SIGN turn green?
Oddly enough...in my city...the statute requires a full stop behind the stop sign, not the stop line. The statute hasn't even caught up with public works.
The OP got hammered by a traffic ##### over a 3" margin of error.
Stop Sign's and White Lines
Discussion in 'Road Stories' started by Coffeeman41086, Mar 25, 2018.
Page 3 of 3
Page 3 of 3