is there a place online you recommend to get a chart with each state's fuel tax? i'll go ahead and google it to see if i can come up with anything in the mean time.
What is IFTA?
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by LimpyLegs, Jan 15, 2009.
Page 2 of 3
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
I have a copy of the list. I've already done my taxes. I think I can post a copy of it here. I lightened it, so you should be able to read it ok.
Our base state was FL and we moved to TN. We only ran one of the trucks for 3 weeks in October before transferring the registration. We never bought fuel in FL, so we're going to get $55.00 back.Attached Files:
Road Killer and LimpyLegs Thank this. -
-
Learning the biz and trying to understand IFTA. Here's how I understand it.
You submit your payment to your home state. With a break out of states you drove in, with how many miles you drove in each state, how much fuel you bought in each state and how many total gallons you consumed.
Your tax for each state is determined by your average MPG. Your total miles for the qtr by your total gallons purchased for the qtr.
Then based on your mpg, total gallons of fuel consumed in each state is calculated off the number of miles driven in that state. You owe for each gallon consumed in that state the tax based on that states current per gallon tax rate.
If the total you paid in fuel taxes over the qtr exceeds what you owe, then IFTA divies it up, pays out all the states and refunds/credits you the difference. If you haven't paid enough, you send in a check to cover.
Thanks, MRoad Killer and LimpyLegs Thank this. -
It would be so much easier if EVERY state just had the same tax for diesel, eliminating need for IFTA altogether. Less paperwork for everyone, and no aneurysms. But I guess that would make things too easy for us truckers. They can't make it TOO easy for us to make good money right? lol
Road Killer Thanks this. -
Personally, I'll take what we've got.
The other problem I have with "every state charging the same tax" is that NO state will lower their fuel tax...which means if that happens, EVERY state will be on par with CA, NY, and IL...so you'll be paying a lot more overall.Road Killer and taxihacker66 Thank this. -
I know NJ sells at some of the lowest prices in the country, but not sure what they tax at. I always wondered how it panned out if you bought most of your fuel in NJ but operated most miles in PA and OH.
I used to live in OR and yeah it's one of the worst states in the country to own and operate a truck or trucking company. I always wondered why didn't just get with the program and tax fuel like every other state does and do away with the hopelessly complicated weight/mile tax scheme. Same thing with NY and KY. They could just raise the fuel tax a touch and get rid of the extra HUT and KYU crap.Last edited: Mar 13, 2016
Road Killer Thanks this. -
The whole IFTA system needs to be rethought. I think it should be based more on weight miles rather than average fuel economy. When you have 2 trucks both on 5 axles each weighing 80,000 pounds they are doing the same damage to the road. The older one gets 5-6 mpg and the newer one gets 7-8 mpg. Why should they not pay the same amount in fuel tax?
It wouldn't be hard to change it. Still pay taxes at the pump as usual and record distance in each state. Each state could come up with an amount per mile similar to how Oregon does it. Calculate the tax paid in and tax due based upon miles driven and registered gross weight and come up with a number. I don't see how this wouldn't be a fair way to still collect taxes which are supposed to go to fix road damage caused by heavy vehicles.Road Killer Thanks this. -
Believe me, the current system is a whole lot simpler than it used to be. A door full of stickers and different plates lining the bottom of your bumper. Having to make sure you bought enough fuel in every state to cover yourself. And if you were due a rebate, Ohio didn't think it was worth paying it if it was under $200.
Road Killer Thanks this. -
I think from government's view it's far easier to administrate and much more difficult for people to cheat their taxes by taxing the fuel compared to taxing weights and axle counts. I could also see it being a bookkeeping nightmare for many companies who don't always run the same axle counts, have some trucks registered for 80k and some for less, etc.
In a perfect world taxing weights and axle counts would be the fairest way to assess road taxes though. The road doesn't care whether your truck gets 5 mpg or 8, it cares how much weight you roll over it and how many axles you do it on.Last edited: Mar 14, 2016
Road Killer Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 2 of 3