Top House Republicans have thrown their support behind the trucking industry and are urging the Obama administration to hit the brakes on proposed regulations that would further limit how long each day that tractor-trailer drivers can stay behind the wheel.
House Speaker John A. Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor on Wednesday sent a letter to President Obama and implored him to pull the plug on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's (FMCSA) new trucking guidelines, which are expected to be finalized later this month. Among other things, the rules would cut the number of hours a driver can be on the road from 11 to 10 a day.
Opponents have argued the changes will lead to more trucks on the road and higher costs for companies, which will be forced to hire more drivers to haul the same amount of products.
"These costs will affect not only the trucking industry, but every business shipping and receiving goods," Mr. Boehner and Mr. Cantor wrote. "Small businesses have already seen shipping costs rise as truckers have passed along the costs of higher gas prices additional shipping costs which will result from the rule change will further strain small businesses in an environment where weakened consumer demand has already put downward pressure on prices."
The two Republican leaders cited an estimated $1 billion in increased costs that the big-rig business will face if the "regulatory burden" is put in place.
Other House Republicans, led by Rep. John L. Mica of Florida, House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman, have also taken aim at the FMCSA and argued that, at a time of economic turmoil, higher costs for companies and consumers would be devastating.
In addition to the daily drive-time change, the rules would also modify the 34-hour period drivers must take off each week. Under the new standards, the 34-hour window would have to include two periods from midnight to 6 a.m., meaning a trucker who finished his week at 1 p.m. on a Friday couldn't return to the road until 6 a.m. Sunday.
Proponents of the regulations say they will reduce driver fatigue and cut the number of tractor-trailer accidents on American highways. Several labor unions, led by the Teamsters, are aggressively backing the changes and have been engaged in a lengthy legal fight with the federal government to push for shorter workdays. The Association of Plaintiff Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America, a group of attorneys that advocates for safer trucking practices, has also joined the debate.
"Since fatigue is a national epidemic, it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that 10 hours per day is safer than 11 hours a day," said Edward C. Bassett Jr., an attorney with the APITLA, in a Wednesday letter to Mr. Obama.
In his letter, Mr. Bassett also pointed out that, until 2003, 10 hours of daily driving time was the standard. When the Bush administration raised that threshold, critics warned that more sleepy truckers and subsequent accidents would result.
But along with that change came other adjustments, such as an increase in the daily rest period from eight to 10 hours. The combination of 11 hours on the road with 10 hours of mandated rest produced a "crucial equilibrium["] that maximized productivity while ensuring drivers are awake and alert for their shifts, said Rob Abbott, the American Trucking Association's (ATA) vice president of safety policy.
"The opponents predicted dire consequences that didn't come true,["] he said Thursday.
There is conflicting data on just how many crashes are related to fatigue. FMCSA estimates previously attributed about 7 percent of accidents to fatigue, though the agency later said that figure is likely low. In his letter, Mr. Bassett cited another FMCSA study that lists the number at 13 percent. Other studies, he said, put the figure at about 35 percent.
Whatever the true number, the American Trucking Associationbelieves there's another important statistic that isn't getting enough attention: Since 2003, tractor-trailer accidents have decreased by 30 percent. While the stated goal is safety, the proposed rules could reverse that trend and lead to more accidents after companies hire rookie drivers to make up for their veterans' lost drive time.
"If you reduce our capacity and productivity you're basically spurring a need to hire additional inexperienced drivers," said Rob Abbott, ATA's vice president of safety policy.
At what point do these idiots who have NEVER driven a truck say "hey...let's go screw with the brain surgeons...We know just as much about their profession as we do about truckers and we got by with screwing their professions up...COULD BE FUN!
AND BEFORE any of you Teamster cronies jump my case remember your so-called "UNION" fights for shorter work days for HOURLY employees whose livings DON'T depend on the miles you cover every day....I'm no admin but I hereby place the BAN HAMMER on Union folks posting to this thread!
New Hours of Servise being fought by ATA...SAY WHAT?!
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by Mr_Magoo, Oct 7, 2011.
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
WOW the REP are really in our corner. I know where I'm voting next time.


-
Well gee now they want to use the FMCSA to further their circus. Shocker. And no less than the evil pricks at the ATA
MY MY MY what strange bedfellows be this. More fodder for the three ring circus. I find it amusing that somehow the pukes sending the letter are now qualified to comment on trucking but people that have worked around the transportation and freight industry for years are not.
The entire myth of needing more inexperienced drivers is quaint. Seems their stock answer for any new reg.
Idle laws will cripple the industry because we can not employ enough teams.
CSA will require 200,000 new inexperienced drivers be introduced.
Revised sleeper berth provision will cripple the industry and require new inexperienced drivers be hired to cover lost time with the 8-2 requirement.
I remember all those headlines or something very close to them. Have no fear the very same groups that started all this with lawsuits (ATA, OOIDA, IBT, CRASH, PATT......) all have their little litigation monkee's chomping on extra bananas in preparation for the crippling regulation.
Oct 15th is the date we are hearing. I'll bet the lawyers are already placing pre-orders on their new Bently's and Benz's in anticipation of the next round of filings.johnday Thanks this. -
I would not be inclined to believe they are in your corner.
The process of these changes to the rules have been in the process since about 2006. Remember who was in charge then.
They are only on the wagon to show a position against the party in control of the government.
They will throw you under the bus when needed just like all others.Last edited: Oct 8, 2011
johnday, Tazz, victormtz1983 and 1 other person Thank this. -
Maybe we should go on strike ... <smirk>
-
funny, one minute the ata says the regs are just fine, next they want to sue over them,what a bunch of corporate butt-kissers they are, just like those morons boehner and cantor
-
whatever happens i dont rly care,shorter work day sounds great if/when i get a local position...IF it pays a living wage.
-
The Republicans are fighting the proposed changes because they came about when Senator Frank Lautenberg (D , NJ ) demanded a review of the HOS . Lautenberg was one of the key Democrats the Teamsters donated over $2 million to in 2008 . After losing court cases and appeals regarding the new HOS the Teamsters decided to try again with the politician in their pocket .
BTW , they have no data to show their requested changes improve safety . They want driving hours reduced from 11 to 10 hours between 10 hour breaks . Research as concluded the most dangerous driving hour is the first hour . If a driver's week requires driving 53 hours that can be accomplished in 5 days driving 11 hours a day . Under a 10 hour rule the driver would be required to drive 6th most dangerous first hour . Forgive me for using logic . -
BTW how many Feaking YEARS did the ORIGINAL HOS work BEFORE all these Rewirtes came out over 70 wasn't it. Now they are on what the 4 one in less than 10 YEARS. Boy the old saying I am from the and I am here to HELP being the Worst sentance in the English Language is SO FREAKING TRUE.
-
The ATA is a lobby group for the big trucking co's, and the only reason they oppose these changes is because they will hurt the ATA's members. The ATA does not care about drivers.
Look at their positions on other issues in trucking. They want a mandate on elogs, they support mandatory speed governors on all CMV's like they have in Canada, and they support the Mexican-US cross-border program.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.