This survey is for ATA members,management dispatchers,saftey department........1.How many hours a day would you like you're drivers to work? 2..How many hours a day do you think it is safe to work? 3.Do you sleep good at night? 4. Would you like to get rid of all D.O.T. regulations.? 5. Why?6. Have you ever lived in a area the size of your wife's walk in closet for a couple of weeks because your job required it? 7. Do you spend weeks in a walk in closet? 8. Why?9. Do you think your drivers deserve better compensation? 10.Are you willing to make a effort to improve their compensation
ATA Survey
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by magnum force, Nov 28, 2011.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Typical they have their fat butts under the kitchen table at five o'clock and piss and moan cause their drivers won't work sixteen hours.
-
Some of those questions were answered at their last lil get together....... They all said yes to more driver compensation HOWEVER it would have to come from higher rates, not their pockets. The yahoo that runs Maverick also said yes but even though he admits he's gotten more than he's paid for in the past ( from drivers ) any salary increase would have to include more driver responsibility.
The owner of Dupre' actually got it right where he said that the way we run drivers and treat them is the same way we did it 30 years ago. Nobody wants these jobs ! We have to change the way we treat our people. -
Anybody notice the political bolagna they ATA puts out in newspapers. They never give a staight answer. Never give a solution and never make a commitment to change anything.In my opinion they dodge questions reply with crying and tears. Who said Oh bill clinton what is is mean or something like that. Help me out.
-
OOIDA has often alleged ATA uses smoke and mirrors to skew statistics .
For example , when trying to mandate speed limiters ATA said in 20% of truck accidents where excessive speed is a factor the speed of the truck is over 65 m.p.h. . They need the figures to get percentages . Why not give the figures . Excessive speed is a "factor" in only 8% of accidents . Keep in mind an accident has multiple factors . If a driver is going 68 m.p.h. in a 65 zone and falls asleep speed is a factor but really didn't contribute .
But say there are 5,000 accidents a year . 8% would be 400 where excessive speed was a factor . Only 80 would have speed as a factor but not a cause . So mandate speed limiters because of a factor in 80 accidents out of 5,000 .
BUT what about the 80% of trucks with excessive speed under 65 m.p.h. ? Guess whose trucks they are . While NHTSA was requesting comments on the speed limiter petition ATA Chairman Pat Quinn found his U.S. Xpress being audited . They were fined for document falsification and given a poor Safety Management rating .
FMCSA had gotten complaints about most USX trucks speeding through 55 m.p.h. zones . If logs show averaging 58 m.p.h. through a 55 m.p.h. state the auditor doesn't determine the driver was speeding . He says the lied on the drive time because it didn't take long enough to drive through that state .
The $7,000 fine was inadequate for a megacarrier but the humiliation of Pat Quinn and exposure of his hypocrisy was priceless .volvodriver01 Thanks this. -
The last Accident I was involved in was because of a speed limiter.I was heading south on I75 thru toledo Ohio rush hour traffic bouncing down the hammer lane. Anyway a minivan was merging from my left off of spur 280.It is a very long safe entrance ramp except for when the ramp ends there is a twenty foot wall there.I am moving right along and the driver keeps speeding up.I MASH THE GAS SO WE DON'T HAVE A TIE.. anyway he ran into the trailer tandem then he decided tto slow down.If I had slowed down he would have been under the trailer.
-
the opposite could have happened to break the tie, you could have backed off a bit and let the idiot have the lead
-
I thought he would have backed out of it around 55mph.He was doing about 70 when we bumped then he took off.about five miles later I caught up with him. He climbed up on the drivers side step with traffic wizzing by I had to tell him over and over get out of traffic. He was drunk or something.
-
anyway I could have avoided the accident if it wasn'
t for the speed limiter. -
Or if you had slowed down. Your own stubborness is to blame. You can't blame the stupidity of the four wheeler. It's a given they're all mostly stupid, aggressive or both. You're supposed to be the professional but aggressive driving ain't very professional.
volvodriver01 Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 2