New truck... but what truck?

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by onedayaway, Sep 16, 2012.

  1. SHC

    SHC Spoiled Rotten Brat O/O

    8,484
    7,047
    Feb 26, 2011
    Westville, IN
    0
    If you are going to stick to 62mph and be empty 50% of the time, then 6mpg is realistic for a 389 or a W9. To be honest, with the work you do, I don't think it's going to matter if it's a hood or a aero, I bet you get the same MPG in either truck.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. DrtyDiesel

    DrtyDiesel Road Train Member

    5,348
    2,598
    Feb 14, 2010
    Jacksonville, FL
    0
    I personally would go with a 389 and 550-600 horse isx. Your pulling 140k gross? Yeah, id say fuel mileage would be on the back burner.

    Just something to think about, I drive an Aero truck, a '13 prostar and get 6.5 MPG average with open deck trailer. If I bought a hood Pete with an 18 speed and 2.64 gears id most likely get close to the same.



    Ethan
     
  4. onedayaway

    onedayaway Light Load Member

    107
    58
    Jun 28, 2011
    alberta
    0
    All of our O/O's seem to be running 389, 379, w900, and xl classics. There is a columbia, fld, and a couple Volos also. So maybe that's the reasoning they just dont find it matters much. Surprisingly we have a lot running flat tops. When I do catch guys and have a chance to talk it amazes me how little these guys pay attention to stuff. I have yet to come across A single one that even knows what he's getting for fuel mileage. Most dont even have a clue what theyre running for power other than the engine model and X speed tranny. When I ask what they think of the aero stuff they claim is just doesn't hold up. They feel the traditional trucks are just better suited. A couple have mentioned very costly repairs to the skirting along the fuel tanks after hitting critters... Which seems to happen for us on a very regular basis.
     
  5. DrtyDiesel

    DrtyDiesel Road Train Member

    5,348
    2,598
    Feb 14, 2010
    Jacksonville, FL
    0
    Yeah those fairings aren't gonna be great if your replacing them several times a year from animals hitting them.

    I know for a fact the hood trucks will be easier to work on just because you can reach everything fine. Shoot on my truck you'd have to take off 20 things just to get to the turbos

    Ethan
     
  6. SHC

    SHC Spoiled Rotten Brat O/O

    8,484
    7,047
    Feb 26, 2011
    Westville, IN
    0
    If you could find a 98-00 FLD then you'd be set. Those trucks are work pigs and can handle just about anything u throw at it. Parts are cheap and easy to fix, plus they get good MPG
     
  7. onedayaway

    onedayaway Light Load Member

    107
    58
    Jun 28, 2011
    alberta
    0
    I actually had my heart set on a 389 but started looking at the kenworth a lot harder after looking at then today.
    With the 389 I can only run a 100/150 gallon and at best I MIGHT be able to get one of those extremely narrow steps for access to the deck.
    With the w900l I can get a 120/135 gallon so an extra 5 gallons and still have plenty of room to add a 12" tool box / step combo on the drivers side. Which I think would be nice.

    With the 244" WB with the 389 and 63" bunk or the w900l with the 72 I can bet there would not be enough room to run a cabinet style head ache rack and hook up to a refer without the 5th wheel slide as far back as it would go so the storage box step combo would be a nice touch.

    Doesnt anyone know the real weight different between the w900l w/ 72 and pete 389 w/ 63? The office is always complaining that the w900's are total pigs and the nose of the trailer have to be loaded extremely light but don't hear nearly as many complaints about the Petes. There been plenty of w9 guys miss out on loads around our place because they're simply too heavy. I really don't want that to be and issue.
     
  8. DrtyDiesel

    DrtyDiesel Road Train Member

    5,348
    2,598
    Feb 14, 2010
    Jacksonville, FL
    0
    I hear ya on the pete, I got my heart set on a 389 with the 48" flat top sleeper.

    I'm not sure on the weight difference though

    Ethan
     
  9. onedayaway

    onedayaway Light Load Member

    107
    58
    Jun 28, 2011
    alberta
    0
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    This is a fairly nice 48" they currently have sitting at the local dealer.
     
  10. DrtyDiesel

    DrtyDiesel Road Train Member

    5,348
    2,598
    Feb 14, 2010
    Jacksonville, FL
    0
    Dude that is gorgeous

    Ethan
     
  11. onedayaway

    onedayaway Light Load Member

    107
    58
    Jun 28, 2011
    alberta
    0
    This is a Canadian 389 with the 244" WB as you can see it really doesn't leave us a ton of room behind the sleeper..

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.