Ok first why on earth is the thread keep getting closed. Its out of control. This is a topic I will open up and bring it to light to everyone. To the mods if you don't like my thread than ban me cause I am screaming to the world how this story is so wrong. but by banning me you will show that you are supporting mega carriers and government control....
Now to the topic. Yes these 65 trucks seem to want to run 55 in a 65 zone clog up all lanes and run side by side for 20 miles. Does the writer really think that this is a safe practice. I call it a pile up in the waiting. Than that same truck or trucks get off and are run 40 through truck stop parking lots and 10 over town speed limits. Is that safe. Sure my truck is un governed and will stay that way. sure I might do 4 or 5 over on the highways. but when I hit the exit running though towns and parking lots I am going nice and easy. Its a lot safer to speed a few on the highway where you don't have walking people or people on pedal bikes and traffic turning everywhere. Just do a search on people ran over in truck stop parking lot and see how many have happened this year alone. No owner operators are a lot safer we have to pay for repairs, we have to worry about paying all the truck bills.
So to all the good guys and gals it was nice knowing you since I have stood my ground on this forum and spoke the truth I am betting I get the ban.....see you later![]()
Owner operators our dangerous part 3 wtheck is up with closing the thread
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by carrkool, May 3, 2013.
Page 1 of 11
-
bbigcnote, KANSAS TRANSIT, rusty2222 and 6 others Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
I was going 60 mph on I-12 E of Baton Rouge Wednesday with the normal safe interval behind the truck in front of me going the same speed . A WalMart company driver passed me and cut between us .
I wondered why he didn't go ahead and pass the other truck then I saw the 60 mph speed zone ended less than a minute later . I pulled out in the left lane and quickly outdistanced him . -
There's nothing wrong with the topic, carrkool. But, when you opened it back up with Part 2, you made an attack on another member the entire premise of your thread. That's not okay. When people continue to beat up on somebody for posting things that most of us don't agree with, it becomes much like beating a dead horse after a while, and it's time to stop it. That's why the first two threads were closed.
I've had a commercial license for over thirty years - I'm old-school to the bone. I bought my first truck over 25 years ago and have been an O/O, as well as a small-fleet owner, so I can assure you that any accusations of O/O's being dangerous is something that I'm really interested in. But, what I'm not interested in are the repetitive personal attacks on people who most of us disagree with.
So, let's all try to avoid the personal stuff and keep this one open so that we can discuss the accusations against O/O's that piss most of us off. And if somebody happens to post something that we don't agree with, let's attack the post - not the poster.48Packard, RickG, RedForeman and 7 others Thank this. -
One thing I do notice is I get cutoff less driving my plain Jane freightliner then when driving my decked out w900l. For some reason the big fleet company trucks see me coming in w9 and pull right out had couple almost take the hood off swinging over so fast. And you right they there run truck massed against speed limiter where ever they are. By the way eobr make okay drivers idiots running the clock.
-
Did you say all that just so you could say you are a owner operator. To be honest, most every truck I see doing 55 in a 65, are o/o or l/p trying to get good enough fuel milage to make a profit.
To me it seems kind of ignorant when drivers imply that, because someone is a o/o, they are automatically a good driver. It only takes good credit, and a year of driving experience to be an o/o. To make it as an o/o, you have to be a better business man than driver.
And as far as taking care of equipment, I believe that comes down to common since, it's hurts a company drivers pocket book to be broke down also.Driver of the year Thanks this. -
one of the things that is consistent is a rant against O'O's because they are "outlaws"
you read it in virtually every magazine, every corporate sponsored website, as if there is this conscious attack against men and women who dare to buck the corporate propaganda
these students leave school, completely brainwashed, writing nonsense that the first poster wrote, which happens to coincide with the propaganda
this attitude is all around us, we shouldnt really be surprised by the letter
what we need to do is organize, but thats a pipe dream alsosnowblind, SHO-TYME and RedForeman Thank this. -
Years ago, I was at a fuel stop with a company driver and I was filling my own truck up as well. His comments let me know the difference between us quite quickly.
He would not open the hood and check the oil or turn off the truck. He was a driver and the company was responsible not him.
You can say whatever you want, but, an owner operator will most likely take care of their equipment and fuel costs better than a company driver.Mastertech, SHO-TYME, volvodriver01 and 3 others Thank this. -
i dont see any of what you are saying
but then again, i am not you -
Where I am, by far the most dangerous drivers on the road are the dump trailer drivers, usually small fleets. They are paid per run, so they are trying to squeeze as many runs per day as possible. They are total lunatics, especially on the secondary roads.
Driver of the year Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 11
