30000 pounds of freight is not top heavy but not lightweight either.
The test was done on hwy 289, I figure it has a few hills and a couple of traffic lights.
Also the truck in question looks really solid, I don't think even a macho like you would get embarrassed driving it
Building A New to Me Pete
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by TwinStickPeterbilt, Aug 20, 2014.
Page 7 of 11
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
KAK, wore out, rollin coal and 2 others Thank this.
-
C'mon guys, let's all sell our hoods and buy slope nosed trucks and make a ton less money so we can brag about the fuel we've saved!!
Derailed, Tall Mike, blacklabel and 1 other person Thank this. -
Um. No thanks.TwinStickPeterbilt, Ruthless and Tall Mike Thank this. -
I would rather see my sister work in a cathouse as my brother drive a Volvo. My ol truck ain't the slickest, true enough it's a standard hood not extended. It can still show it's tail lights to most any one that wants to see them, headed north on 65 toward Branson at 80000 lbs. 5.7 is what she avgerages total miles. With a Pott and hopper loaded like a freight train all the time I will take that. Especially the way I drive it. I don't drive like an egg is under the throttle. The good lord gave me a right foot I use it
blacklabel, Tall Mike and TwinStickPeterbilt Thank this. -
Ok, ok. Its a free country, I mean used to be. But if you insist good luck in all your endeavors, I'm sure you will all miss me.
-
I say build that new to you Pete. Build it right and it will be better than one of these plastic throw aways that's only good for a half a million.Last edited: Sep 13, 2014
timc1134, TwinStickPeterbilt and blacklabel Thank this. -
To each there own. One of the few good things still left in this business is the ability to operate it with your own individual style. I think a happy median can be found between fuel mileage and old iron and will be even more so in the future with more advanced developments for older trucks. I think the non emissions computerized motors would be the way to go like a 6NZ or similar for your project IMO although I know your looking at mechanical. I was ecstatic when my most recent average was 5.8mpg. With that being said I pull a conestoga with a flat top classic and usually cruise around 71mph. The motor has some work done and an ecm tune, pretty much walk most hills grossed out like its empty. I can live with that. I tried the cruise set at 62 mph thing and it lasted about a half hour and the thought of jumping out of the truck rolling down the road crossed my mind a couple of times. Just cant do it. The comment about the $1/mile plus fuel surcharge hit the nail on the head. I think its what alot of these new breed guys are basing there model on and banking on there truck getting 9 mpg. These guys think this business is about making just enough to get by for some reason.
Last edited: Sep 13, 2014
TwinStickPeterbilt, Ruthless, rollin coal and 4 others Thank this. -
Let's see guys let's haul 65,000 pounds in a cattle pot close off all the ventilation so it pulls like a van then put a 587 with a 400hp cummins and a automatic and drive 55 all the time. You could paint it white and slap Swift on the door and everyone would think swift got a new livestock division.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 7 of 11