Get a load of this guy. He thinks I'm an old fart like pack rat or something!
Haha, no my new friend. There's a good chance you may be older than myself, and I got into trucking to pay my tuition bills for my BA in networking tech so I'm fairly technologically inclined.
You're missing my point, the majority are getting it, though.
Someone a a few posts made a good point about the hand cranked fuel pumps, and analogy about how the modernization of this industry isn't all bad. I agree.
but...These GPS units...they're more trouble than they're worth...it makes us lazy and allows the new guys to find out the hard way that here junk.
MY biggest gripe? The cost. I'll never pay more than $100 for some piece of crap that is going to cause more trouble than it's worth.
like your gps? Hey that's great. Throw your .02 in and move on. No need to get so hostile.
Drivers, why are we using GPS units?
Discussion in 'Experienced Truckers' Advice' started by cabwrecker, Aug 27, 2014.
Page 18 of 26
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Oh I forgot to answer these:
*sigh* paccar, the company that makes Peterbilt and Kenworth have worked a deal with Garmin to add a gps unit to the center dash area for heir trucks. From this touch screen dash you can access gauges, technical, spec, performance and maintenance data from the truck. It also has a nice Bluetooth feature, allows you to work with the built in Sirius radio, and finnaly yes- use the built in gps.
just because there is a Garmin dezel in the 587 I drive doesn't mean I had any choice in what went into it.
Also woefully incorrect about the different brands of gps being dissimilar. Again I will grant you that there are some big differences, and I would say that the rand gps sets are by far the oddest in how they're setup to find points of interest and addresses. BUT- overall having owned garmins, and PC millers, and cobras, and rands, hell I even used a magellen and tomtom! - I can say they all operate along the same lines. What's more, I can say that with experience
Another thing I can say? They all suck. -
i will agree with you on them being similar for car GPSs but not the trucking ones.
-
Another thing. I am a paid tourist. No really, it is in my job description: Truck Driver/Paid Tourist.
Does your atlas show historical monuments, museums and other tourist attractions along your route? Just curious. -
lack of knowledge of how to update, and how to make the correct settings choices... all user error, not the tools error.
Are gps 100% fool proof, no and neither is a paper map. -
you do understand that both garmin and Rand both use the same base navigation maps, supplied by, Navteq. And navteq gets their information from the state highway departments.
-
on what road, is this 11ft bridge you keep talking about that does not exist? And if you really cared about it working correctly, you report that error to navteq, they will verify, and fix on the next quarterly update....6 Speed Thanks this.
-
actually those bridges do exist on the PA turnpike... the state of PA reports those bridges that have less than 13'6" clearance ON THE SHOULDER as low clearance, and until the state of PA changes that reporting, the lawyers will not allow navteq to report them as anything different... so it is NOT the GPS's fault, but the state of PA who is reporting the bridges at the wrong height....6 Speed Thanks this.
-
all gps's use the same navigable map, supplied by navteq.
-
but not all add in all the trucking data.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 18 of 26