DPF on older truck??

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by areelius, Aug 1, 2015.

  1. areelius

    areelius Light Load Member

    270
    119
    Nov 9, 2012
    Temecula Ca
    0
    Sorry; you are right about that. I should have said the engines with newer emission equipment. I consider that from 2009 to 2015. When I look at these year engines, all I see is whole lot of computer operated equipment on the side of the engine, where mine has empty space.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. daf105paccar

    daf105paccar Road Train Member

    6,564
    7,293
    Apr 15, 2012
    0
    Areelius,there is a big difference between DEF and non-DEF engines.
    If you don't like any engine with several computers on it, that's fine, it is your choice.
    But the way you portray it,you lump them all together. EPA 07 and EPA 10 engines.
     
  4. Camelclutch

    Camelclutch Light Load Member

    151
    167
    Jun 19, 2015
    Anaheim, California
    0
    I think what he means is much less STUFF to go wrong. Around here all shops are SLAMMED with trucks 2008's to brand new ones, tons of down time and lost revenue
     
    areelius Thanks this.
  5. areelius

    areelius Light Load Member

    270
    119
    Nov 9, 2012
    Temecula Ca
    0
    Right again;
    I do lump them together. I suppose its because after seeing enough of them stranded with the hood open, they all look similar. The majority I have seen were orange engines. Some were the twin turbo Cats also. That is why Cat finally realized they could not keep their good name and remain in the on-highway engine business. I know the difference in them, but it is the reliability I question.
    Cummins should be embarrassed , and they used to be one of the finest engines out there. What they do now is build the emission system, and then mount an engine on it. This is why even diesel mechanics are often at a loss to repair them. Now it takes a new breed which is just an emission expert to fix them. The engines would be fine if they were not wired into the emission system. I would be bankrupt if I had bought an 09 or newer truck. It equals high payments AND high maintenance costs. I can't afford both.

    My friend bought 3 new 2011 Volvos with D 13s. Long before they were out of warranty the injectors failed on 2 of the trucks. The factory replaced the injectors of course, but the fuel mileage went from 7.2 to 5.5 MPG. Plus he had huge payments on these trucks.
    The factory said they had no idea why and did nothing more about it. This alone nearly forced my friend into bankruptcy. His operating costs are far higher now than what the factory numbers said they should be.
    Imagine this event after the warranty expired? When I saw this happen to him I decided I was better off with an old pre EGR truck. Maybe some owners can make it work with problems like that, but I couldn't. I can not find a similar story about a pre EGR engine. When they added the EGR to 2003 engines, many owners claimed the EGR caused more maintenance and trips to the shop than the rest of the engine maintenance combined.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2015
  6. Camelclutch

    Camelclutch Light Load Member

    151
    167
    Jun 19, 2015
    Anaheim, California
    0
    Yeah, if you have multiple trucks, one of them can sit for a week, imagine being in east kabumfuk and being down for a week in a hotel:confused:
     
  7. daf105paccar

    daf105paccar Road Train Member

    6,564
    7,293
    Apr 15, 2012
    0
    Sir,I agree that sitting for a week is unaccepteble.
    BUT that has nothing to do with emmissions, that's a workshop giving poor service to it's clients.
    Same for the injectors Areelius mentioned.
     
    areelius Thanks this.
  8. Camelclutch

    Camelclutch Light Load Member

    151
    167
    Jun 19, 2015
    Anaheim, California
    0
    I absolutely agree, but a sensor issue or warranty repairs are taking days to figure out. I have a friend with a transfer.Got talked into a new 2014 389.In six months he claimed 49 days of unexpected down time in shop.Not ALL have been emissions Issues but thats a new one.God knows if you buy a trade in with 3,4,5 hundred k of hard driven ,below freezing miles on itWe're talking peterbilt, kenworth and, freighliner dealerships in a huge metro area.Imagine in some small town where they hardly ever see an issue like this, so they throw new parts at the problem and send you down the road.
     
  9. daf105paccar

    daf105paccar Road Train Member

    6,564
    7,293
    Apr 15, 2012
    0
    Who knows,that smaller dealer might care more about his clients and have invested the time and money to go to the classes the brands want them to follow to keep up to date with modern times.
    There is a thread on TTR by a warranty manager.
    In it there is a story about how a dealer wanted the trucker to pay the work and parts for a repair done on a truck under warranty and then,according to that dealer,the trucker had to reclaim that money from Paccar,which is complete BS.
    Would i trust that dealer to work on a'12..................NO.
    But would i trust him to work on a '99,full mechanical engine......................?
    NO WAY!!!!!!!
    Because that dealer is just out there to get the $$$$$ from truckers.
     
  10. AModelCat

    AModelCat Road Train Member

    29,435
    161,841
    Jul 7, 2015
    Canuckistan
    0
    I wouldn't just say Cummins are junk. Every engine manufacturer is having problems with meeting Tier 4 emission standards reliably. In the off road equipment world we're seeing all kinds of issues from this pollution garbage as well. I was recently talking with a Deutz engine tech who told me last winter alone they had over 100 new Tier 4 compliant engines in Western Canada fail and had to be replaced under warranty. At this point in time, from what I'm told anyways, is that this is the final stage for emission reductions so hopefully the manufacturers will be able to fine tune and improve on what we have today.
     
  11. daf105paccar

    daf105paccar Road Train Member

    6,564
    7,293
    Apr 15, 2012
    0
    One would think so.
    The "joke" is that if you were to drive with a EPA10 truck in Changhai,China the exhaust fumes would be cleaner then the air going in the engine.

    Trucking has done it's part in emissions ,time for other industries to do the same.
     
    AModelCat Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.