...and I'm exactly the opposite. At the end of a long day, whether I made it home or not, I want to be able to kick off my boots, grab a cool shower, and relax for a while. Can't do that in a truck. Another benefit of a day cab, especially running flats or dumps or any other wagon that can deliver anywhere is that you can get away with running roads not typically run by trucks without drawing too much attention. A road tractor will get more scrutiny, as they might be lost. Day cab looks like a local who knows where he's going.
I quit sleeping in trucks over 10 years ago, and when I signed on where I'm at now, I told 'em I don't mind running the road, but it needs to pay enough to justify a room at the Holiday Inn Express. Like I said, I want to be comfortable. Clean room, comfortable bed, and a good breakfast. Every once in a while, there are other "extra" perks, too...![]()
![]()
Is it feasible to run a daycab in this situation?I
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by Driver0000, Jun 11, 2017.
Page 4 of 6
-
tucker, brian991219, LoneCowboy and 3 others Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
I've spent nights on a blanket under a tree in a field adjacent to a lot I could park the truck...with my 100# dog on a leash tied to my wrist. Only "witness" to that was the dog. No receipts. No documentation. No violation. Nowhere in the regulations will you find a stipulation that you must document and prove your lodgings for the night if you were "off duty".brian991219 and Chasingthesky Thank this.
-
Looking at a 2005 Mack vision with 450,000 on it. ASET/AC engine 355/380.
Bucket seats.
Talked to a guy at CPG today and he just runs local in a sleeper. And he doesn't touch their overweight longer 500 mile runs that I'm eyeballing.
He goes out 100-250 miles or so and gets back daily.
I'll do some of that too but I'd rather do a 500 mile run and come back the next day and get the extra pay for running an overweight load.HalpinUout Thanks this. -
None of which are required to be carried in the truck. The carrier needs to keep them IF they exist and are turned in, but they don't HAVE to exist.brian991219 and Chasingthesky Thank this.
-
For what it's worth, that is one darn limp-wristed truck, if your goal is to haul cans. Hope it's got a decent transmission and rear end ratio or you're gonna go backwards if it sees a mountain. That's a flatland light-load spec, just from engine ratings alone.
Ruthless Thanks this. -
I'd be interested in seeing if you can make that work. I concocted a similar plan not too long ago to haul within a 250-300 mile radius of home.
A roofing manufacturer I hauled out of years ago payed a premium for loads north of 47k. Stands to reason they wouldn't be the only ones to do that. So, knowing that shingles are considered "cheap" freight last I heard, that begged the question of whether or not it's possible to compensate for the "cheapness" of "cheap" freight by getting more of it on the truck. -
Is it really? I drive a pinnacle now and it pulls really well in the mountains when I'm at 80k.
Tell me more before I make a big mistake. -
What engine do you have in yours?
-
I'll find out in the morning. Was the ASET/AC 355/380 really made for flats?
I've gone over these mountains (Appalachians) heavy (well 80k) in Volvos, this Mack Pinnacle, and a 2014 Prostar. The Prostar was the only one that really struggled, but it was turned down and even it made it through with no real hiccups.
Is that ASET engine more for local construction use or something? -
Well, I'll defer to the owner ops here of course, but as far as I'm concerned as long as the powerplant has the torque to do the job, it's GTG.
Sure, that 355/380 will get the job done, but you'll work for it.Driver0000 Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 4 of 6