See this right here,
![]()
It applies in every jurisdiction in the United States and at every scale house and in every DOT officers car. It’s the law period, follow it and you’ll be fine. Section 393.102 covers exactly what I said and here that is.
![]()
It’s right there in black and white, I can’t see how you could read that and tell me I’m wrong. Every DOT I’ve ever dealt with in multiple states has had that book. If they try to tell me I have to have something I don’t I’m going to make them show me where it says it. And yes I’ve don’t that very thing and yes you can challenge them when they’re wrong.
Stop coming on here and pretending that it’s more than it is so you can sound smarter than you really are. You’re probably better off in your little circle of buddies talking about me where I can’t respond because it won’t work here.
Big Loads - Post Photos Number 2
Discussion in 'Heavy Haul Trucking Forum' started by truckdad, Aug 3, 2015.
Page 579 of 957
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Has anybody used this? It’s pricey but interesting.
BigBob410, MartinFromBC, cke and 4 others Thank this. -
An A-gamer would never use it.BigBob410, cke, Oxbow and 1 other person Thank this.
-
I haven't seen those before, they look interesting though.
I purchased some additional chain the other day:
BigBob410, MartinFromBC, cke and 4 others Thank this. -
Well I never professed to be one. That’s why I don’t concern myself with whether someone else has chained properly or not. Life is easier when you just deal with your problems.MartinFromBC, cke, booley and 4 others Thank this.
-
You bought that high dollar grade 100 stuff. Nice.cke, Feedman, johndeere4020 and 1 other person Thank this.
-
So what is the breaking strength of your chain?MartinFromBC and cke Thank this.
-
60,000 for 1/2” grade 100 and 35,200 for grade 100 3/8. But that’s why I posted the correction to your statement. If you use the book you don’t need to know the breaking strength just the WLL. You’re confusing the two and therefore giving bad information. You jump on people for giving bad information so you shouldn’t.
-
Here’s the right information
-
You missed the important part of my question. I know the breaking strength of new chain, I asked what is the breaking strength of your chain.
Used chain, with it's dings, rust, marrs, etc has a diminished capacity so it's breaking strength is unknown. That's why WLL is marked and used, it takes these factors into account.
As far as your "Mr. Greatest ever blah blah blah" comment, take a look at your own posts with an unbiased eye sir...hello pot.
You may as well use this book as toilet paper in Canada, cause that's all it's worth. Once again, my point was the wording from the book on the FMCSA site above is the North American Cargo Securement Standard. Let me clear again about this, the USofA is IN North America, North America IS NOT in the USofA. Canadian refs are 80/50/20 WLL, and unless I know for a fact that someone asking a load securement question ONLY runs in the US, this WILL BE the standard I provide. I choose not to set someone up for failure when I don't know their complete application.13pete Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 579 of 957