ITS new update KILLS efficiency!!!!

nooooo it's not, it's a eye stresseser on a large monitor and not only did they screwed this up but they screwed up how it's sorting. If you select to sort one of the columns by numeric value. Example try to search a area the has over 200 loads and then try to arrange loads by lowest weight 1st.. It's completely broken..

 

I’m trying to understand your post, was this something that changed after the last update?

so if I arrange by weight... what happens? I’m about to try on the phone and see what happens

 

The weight category seems to flip well (rearrange) ... on the phone “desktop” version

 

It's not just on the phone it's on the PC..


example loads sorted by weight lowest 1st..

This is 1st page (1-200 results)... it starts at 35k???.. then goes into the 40k's



Meanwhile page 2 (201-300 something) starts with the actual lowest weight load..




It's completely reversed.. Page 2 should be page 1 if I'm searching for the lowest to the highest weight..

(Honestly there should be a option to search a weight range but that's a whole different issue..why that isn't a basic option I have no clue)

The problem happens where there is more than 1 page of results.. If there is 10 results and you select the basic 10 loads view it doesn't have a problem, but if you have 20 loads and still select the 10 loads per page as example it doesn't order them right..

Obviously no one uses the 10 display but it becomes a serious mess when there is say 300-400 loads and you don't want to view 200 on a page so you select the 50 or 100 option. The sorting gets all kinds of screwed up.. It never did this before. It worked fine before the update..

 

Also.. before to give example why moving the pay to the left is bad...

Before I could simply focus on the right half of the load board and scroll through large numbers of loads very fast..



Example I'd focus on the red line and to the right of it... the X'd area I didn't have to really focus on unless I liked a load then I'd see who was the broker..

I was able to ignore half the load board columns until I was zeroing in on a load.. Now I'm forced to look at the entire board and it becomes very stressful on the eyes.. because i'm looking from extreme left to right to try and figure out the rate per mile.. It should be right there all in the same place. It was fine before..

In fact IMHO the rate should be next to the miles if anything..