ITS new update KILLS efficiency!!!!

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by HopeOverMope, Apr 30, 2020.

  1. crocky

    crocky Road Train Member

    1,732
    1,577
    Jun 28, 2017
    0

    nooooo it's not, it's a eye stresseser on a large monitor and not only did they screwed this up but they screwed up how it's sorting. If you select to sort one of the columns by numeric value. Example try to search a area the has over 200 loads and then try to arrange loads by lowest weight 1st.. It's completely broken..
     
    Rideandrepair and HopeOverMope Thank this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. HopeOverMope

    HopeOverMope Road Train Member

    1,801
    3,211
    Feb 25, 2016
    I-20 LOUISIANA
    0
    I’m trying to understand your post, was this something that changed after the last update?

    so if I arrange by weight... what happens? I’m about to try on the phone and see what happens
     
    Rideandrepair Thanks this.
  4. HopeOverMope

    HopeOverMope Road Train Member

    1,801
    3,211
    Feb 25, 2016
    I-20 LOUISIANA
    0
    The weight category seems to flip well (rearrange) ... on the phone “desktop” version
     
    Rideandrepair Thanks this.
  5. crocky

    crocky Road Train Member

    1,732
    1,577
    Jun 28, 2017
    0

    It's not just on the phone it's on the PC..


    example loads sorted by weight lowest 1st..

    This is 1st page (1-200 results)... it starts at 35k???.. then goes into the 40k's

    [​IMG]

    Meanwhile page 2 (201-300 something) starts with the actual lowest weight load..

    [​IMG]


    It's completely reversed.. Page 2 should be page 1 if I'm searching for the lowest to the highest weight..

    (Honestly there should be a option to search a weight range but that's a whole different issue..why that isn't a basic option I have no clue)

    The problem happens where there is more than 1 page of results.. If there is 10 results and you select the basic 10 loads view it doesn't have a problem, but if you have 20 loads and still select the 10 loads per page as example it doesn't order them right..

    Obviously no one uses the 10 display but it becomes a serious mess when there is say 300-400 loads and you don't want to view 200 on a page so you select the 50 or 100 option. The sorting gets all kinds of screwed up.. It never did this before. It worked fine before the update..
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2020
    Rideandrepair Thanks this.
  6. crocky

    crocky Road Train Member

    1,732
    1,577
    Jun 28, 2017
    0
    Also.. before to give example why moving the pay to the left is bad...

    Before I could simply focus on the right half of the load board and scroll through large numbers of loads very fast..

    [​IMG]

    Example I'd focus on the red line and to the right of it... the X'd area I didn't have to really focus on unless I liked a load then I'd see who was the broker..

    I was able to ignore half the load board columns until I was zeroing in on a load.. Now I'm forced to look at the entire board and it becomes very stressful on the eyes.. because i'm looking from extreme left to right to try and figure out the rate per mile.. It should be right there all in the same place. It was fine before..

    In fact IMHO the rate should be next to the miles if anything..
     
    Rideandrepair Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.