I worked mine a little different today. $100 per mile, but only 3 miles per trip. Did get in three trips though and was done by 2.
I am leased on to a company and have to give up 15% and never even think about getting my own authority. 2.16 per mile to me for all miles last year after they got there cut. The year before I only ran 77000 miles because I was building my house and had to take a good bit of time off. I got 2.45 a mile to me after company got their cut.
I wouldn't go for a big company, look for a small company with big contacts. Possibly talk to the other o/o's and see how happy they are. You can also just go all in and get your own authority but I wouldn't recommend that until you had some experience of at least owning and running your own ride for a while. I know some do okay running spot freight but I personally wouldn't want to do that all of the time. To each his own though. You and yours are the only ones you gotta please and everyone measures success differently.
Leasing onto a company... take Landstar for example.. how is the low rates worth it?
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by freightwipper, Sep 18, 2014.
Page 9 of 10
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
-
-
So would most here say that Landstar is a pretty good outfit to lease your truck to in their van division if you have a good background with going rates and a know how of salesmanship?
-
-
yep! good company seems like. they seem to be with you all the way. they seem to help you when you need help. just a phone call away what i hear.
-
I drove for land star, great support staff, great trailers, however I feel their 35% cut is really unfair and hurts the drivers
-
BigBadBill Thanks this.
-
what ever makes you smile, is what i say you know
-
Sorry to dig up an old thread...but this read like the best info I've read on LS BCOs as of yet.
How is LS running these days?
Price difference between 65% and 72% for bringing your own van, is roughly $15,000/yr. $288/week - it's got to be definitely much cheaper to buy and finance a decent trailer for less than that, or am I wrong?
Also, about the 72%, where does the other 28% go to?
I guess I'm not understanding, if one gets 72% of the "load", is that 72% of what the agent gets from the shipper, or is it 72% of whatever you and the agent agree to?
For example, the Agent books the load with shipper for $4,000, you agree to haul it for $3,000, and LS takes 28% of the $3,000? How does Landstar as a company oversee their agents? I'm not sure it's a very good idea to not only negotiate a brokered load, but then give LS company an extra 28% on top of that...
What would make sense to me, is Landstar takes 100% of the shipper pays, gives the BCO 72% of that, and gives the agent half of what's left, or 14%. That way, all 3 parties involved know all the information involved about what was agreed to, everyone has incentive to increase their profits, and everyone is more happy with the increased transparency.
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but was very curious about leasing to Landstar.
Thanks!
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 9 of 10