Our 4 new Penske Volvos came in. There's little space inside as compared to the Cascadia. One of our drivers complained and no storage space nor armrests on the seats. So I went to get my new truck and brought it back to work to show my manager. He agreed on all counts. He had already gotten the OK to order two more trucks.
My manager relied upon the current drivers to pick the new trucks. I didn't work there yet, but everyone wanted the Volvos and manual transmission. He's probablyly going to order Cascadias next time, but I have a lot of input at this point.
I talked to the service manager at Penske and was told they can't order the wide bodies nor longer sleepers from Volvo. He didn't know why.
If you were going to spec a truck aimed at comfort and fuel mileage what would you choose? I'm thinking Cascadias, DD15, and auto transmissions. Which transmission and gear ratio would be best? Currently we're running 70 mph from Louisville to California, then we return. I'm sure I can get an idle and fuel mileage program started if we slow down.
I need to call my manager and see if Petes are an options for us.
Specing a Cascadia or a Volve for Fuel Mileage
Discussion in 'Experienced Truckers' Advice' started by Blind Driver, Jun 30, 2015.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Get the Mercedes/Freightliner transmission>
It was designed for the DD engines. -
Cascadia order the evolution. Volvo the XE package. Both are setup from factory for fuel mileage the work is already done for you
-
The Cascadia Evolution I'm driving is touching 8 mph right out of the gate. That's with the cruise set at 68 mph. Not bad at all.
-
My Volvo 780 with the XE package was averaging 8.9 mpg earlier this week.
-
Penske specs indicate Evolution, DD15, DT12, and 3.08 gears. I told the boss the gear ratio should be 2.50s and I'd like to see what options are available. We are getting factory inverters
Last edited: Jul 1, 2015
-
The aerodynamics of the Freightliner are better than the Volvo. We did head to head tests with them and the Freightliner beat the Volvo. With the Freightliner you can get the Detroit package (engine transmission) that will get good fuel economy. You can also get the Cummins Smart Torque II package which uses an Eaton Ultrashift Plus Transmission. They both get around the same fuel mileage with in the percentage of error (Detroit vs Cummins). If your drivers wanted to get a manual I would suggest a 10 speed direct drive with 2.64 rear end gears. Just my experience with them.
Blind Driver Thanks this. -
this is coming from a drivers POV here. but why the heck would you want 2.64? penske is going to nut the heck out of that truck. it wont pull worth a ####. will be good for flat ground but useless on mts/hills. i would at least get 3.08-3.23
-
I run a 15 Evolution, DD15, DT12, 2.47 rears. Sweet spot is 65 to 68 MPH, at 1450 to 1525 RPM.
Last edited: Jul 2, 2015
Blind Driver Thanks this. -
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 1 of 2