Should double brokering be made illegal?

Discussion in 'Freight Broker Forum' started by ttnae, Aug 14, 2020.

  1. ttnae

    ttnae Light Load Member

    100
    168
    Oct 4, 2013
    0
    Broker "A" has to be diligent in making sure that they are dealing with the end carrier. In the case where broker b has presented themselves as a carrier and they are not, allow that broker A can bypass broker B in the payment. Make broker A liable for the payment but do not let broker B out of the liability train. Doing this would greatly discourage the behavior which will help all of trucking.
     
    alds and Long FLD Thank this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. ttnae

    ttnae Light Load Member

    100
    168
    Oct 4, 2013
    0
    Duplicate. Removed.
     
  4. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  5. ttnae

    ttnae Light Load Member

    100
    168
    Oct 4, 2013
    0
    I like your thinking but that is not always true. Sometimes, carriers have well established relationships with their customers and the customer will have a large project or spike in production. They will trust their reliable carrier to find additional trucks.
     
  6. wichris

    wichris Road Train Member

    3,948
    7,568
    Jan 17, 2011
    0
    That may be true, was termed interlining, but has not been legal since MAP-21
     
    PPDCT Thanks this.
  7. PPDCT

    PPDCT Road Train Member

    1,803
    5,591
    Jun 15, 2017
    St. Paul, MN
    0
    Saved me the post I was just typing.
     
  8. wichris

    wichris Road Train Member

    3,948
    7,568
    Jan 17, 2011
    0
    Speed it up a bit. LOL
     
    PPDCT Thanks this.
  9. wichris

    wichris Road Train Member

    3,948
    7,568
    Jan 17, 2011
    0
    371.7 (b)
     
    PPDCT Thanks this.
  10. PPDCT

    PPDCT Road Train Member

    1,803
    5,591
    Jun 15, 2017
    St. Paul, MN
    0
    Haha, I was chatting with the new hire we have. My bad.

    Thanks- didn't have a chance to really dig too deep into it over the weekend. Was a busy one.

    Edit to add:

    Here's the link to the applicable CFR that Chris is talking about:

    49 CFR § 371.7 - Misrepresentation.
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2020
  11. ttnae

    ttnae Light Load Member

    100
    168
    Oct 4, 2013
    0
    I've been searching: This article explains a little better than I understood.
    Double Brokering IS illegal, though done.
    Since MAP-21 the term Co-Brokering has popped up BUT with co-brokering, Broker A is to cut 2 payments, one to the co broker and one to the carrier. When this is NOT done, then it is definitely double brokering. The FMCSA or whomever is the watchdog agency, needs to start auditing these folks for a change.
    Double Brokering
     
    alds Thanks this.
  12. wichris

    wichris Road Train Member

    3,948
    7,568
    Jan 17, 2011
    0
    Co brokering has been around long before MAP-21. No where in the CFR's does it state that "Broker A"has to make two payments like you state. No where in the CFR's does it state that a broker must give the load to a carrier. Double broker is when the original broker has no idea that the load is being brokered a second time. Co brokered is when there is an agreement between them. Far better to get your info from the CFR's than from a news article.
     
    Rideandrepair and p608 Thank this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.