Post flatbed load photos here V2.0

Discussion in 'Flatbed Trucking Forum' started by leftlanetruckin, Feb 18, 2014.

  1. cke

    cke Road Train Member

    5,950
    73,196
    Aug 4, 2013
    Colfax Wi
    0
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Razororange

    Razororange Road Train Member

    2,502
    23,871
    Dec 20, 2011
    Milwaukee, WI
    0

    393.110 Covers number of tiedowns required on a load.

    Specifically section 393.110(a)(3) is what you guys are talking about.

    People commonly misread it as requiring 2 tiedowns within the first 10 feet. It actually says you need 2 for the first 10 feet of length and then 1 more for every 10 feet or fraction of 10 feet beyond that.

    The best part of 393.110 is part (d) at the end of it. That part basically says you can just ignore the rest of 393.110 before it if your freight is "special" and has to be secured a certain way. Just says you have to have it secured in a way that will prevent movement then.

    I've hauled a 40ft steel spreader beam for a rail car manufacturer that was only 3,000 lbs. It sat on 2 4x4s spaced 20ft apart under the lifting eyes. I tied it down with 2 x 2" ratchet straps through the lifting points on top. If I had tried to put straps anywhere else it had a high chance of bending the beam if the trailer were to flex. Under 393.110(d) I was legal.
     
    NoBigHurry, kylefitzy, CAXPT and 9 others Thank this.
  4. Razororange

    Razororange Road Train Member

    2,502
    23,871
    Dec 20, 2011
    Milwaukee, WI
    0
    A good example of specialized stuff for above would be the generator rotors I haul. This one is 117,000 lbs. Not allowed to secure it anywhere but between the 2 main rings. 9 x 1/2" chains over the top for a total of 101,700 lbs of WLL. The rotor itself is about 45ft long and all 9 chains are in the middle 15ft.

    IMG_20190508_063724208.jpg
     
  5. Nostalgic

    Nostalgic Road Train Member

    1,813
    20,004
    Mar 6, 2017
    PA
    0
    Anyone else look at this and hear TQL in their fresh out of college voice "yeah, uhm my man, it's steel tubing, 117k whatever that means, strap an go, paying $1275. That's like.... wow $6 a mile."
     
  6. Espressolane

    Espressolane Road Train Member

    17,507
    107,140
    Nov 21, 2009
    Just south of the north 40
    0
    Not going to drag this out, but if you read the regulations, you will find a section that covers the 2 in 10 foot part. The reg states that if no headboard is mounted, then you need 2 in the first 10 feet. Read the regulations, pretty clear.
     
    cke, Kyle G. and CAXPT Thank this.
  7. Diesel Dave

    Diesel Dave Last Few of the OUTLAWS

    8,700
    24,831
    Jan 20, 2010
    Hesperia, Ca.
    0
    Saturday gravy run

    IMG_5218.jpeg IMG_5219.jpeg
     
    beastr123, cke, Kyle G. and 7 others Thank this.
  8. Razororange

    Razororange Road Train Member

    2,502
    23,871
    Dec 20, 2011
    Milwaukee, WI
    0
    Number of tiedowns with or without a headerboard or bulkhead is covered in 393.110 that I quoted above.
    Section 393.110(b) covers loads without a headerboard or bulkhead.
    Section 393.110(c) covers loads with a headerboard or bulkhead.

    It says that without a headerboard or bulkhead you must have 2 for the first 10 feet and 1 for every 10 ft after.

    With a headerboard or bulkhead you only need 1 for the first 10 ft and then 1 more for every 10ft of length past that.

    No part of the laws say where on the piece or how close or far apart the tiedowns must be placed.
     
    NoBigHurry, beastr123, cke and 6 others Thank this.
  9. Espressolane

    Espressolane Road Train Member

    17,507
    107,140
    Nov 21, 2009
    Just south of the north 40
    0
    Going to have to defer to your expertise on the subject.
     
    cke, Kyle G., booley and 2 others Thank this.
  10. CAXPT

    CAXPT Road Train Member

    3,125
    14,100
    Feb 10, 2008
    Michigan
    0
    The problem, of course, is that Booley's load, has the dunnage in front of the strapping, where at the least, to keep in the spirit of that reg, perhaps he should have strapped those two straps forward of the dunnage, or moved the dunnage toward the front of the trailer, considering the over length, engaging the steel sooner within those trailer boundaries and that would have removed some of the possiblity of being gigged.

    Most of the time, the rules are there for guidance, with the exception of the load specific regs, but...even those can be used on similar types of freight that could qualify for that style of securement, and of course, as you point out, the catch all of specialty freight and securement guidelines as is practicable. Which goes back to the point that often, we over secure, to be sure. :)
    :banghead:
     
    NoBigHurry, cke, Kyle G. and 2 others Thank this.
  11. PSM379

    PSM379 Heavy Load Member

    901
    3,647
    Apr 19, 2019
    0
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.