The Trucker Paper

Discussion in 'Swift' started by Rug_Trucker, Jan 3, 2011.

  1. Injun

    Injun Road Train Member

    8,501
    9,491
    May 15, 2010
    West o' the Big Crick
    0
    I don't think this is on a straight percentage. It looks more like a points system to me. If Swift in fact had 18% of its drivers on controlled substances, do you honestly think they'd still be on the road? 18% of 16K power units...nearly 2900 drivers running around stoned? Really??? While the numbers we see do reflect the standing of the company (out of the 25 largest, Swift is somewhere in the top 10 "cleanest" CSA scores) and this system takes into account per capita violations per set number of units, it can't possibly be a straight percentage.

    Let's take a step back until we actually understand this. If you bother to read the accompanying article, you can see the results of touting misunderstood numbers.

    Is Swift the absolute safest? Nope. But on the other side of the token, it is far, far from the worst. Unfortunately, these numbers will be used incorrectly to state such ridiculousness as I outlined above.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. TruckrsWife

    TruckrsWife Significant Otter

    3,208
    42,587
    Aug 29, 2008
    God's Country, CA
    0
    You've just basically said the same thing as the person who you responded to. The same side of the same coin.
     
    scottied67 Thanks this.
  4. DickJones

    DickJones Road Train Member

    1,287
    592
    Aug 16, 2010
    0
    nuh-huh.....:biggrin_25522:

    more like 'same coin....but the edge of it'. :biggrin_25525:
     
    TruckrsWife, Fewe and otherhalftw Thank this.
  5. TruckrsWife

    TruckrsWife Significant Otter

    3,208
    42,587
    Aug 29, 2008
    God's Country, CA
    0
    Until they have sufficient data on all categories, it's all a stab in the dark. Some companies will have no data for crashes for instance. And until all the data is in and computed, and not left in limbo while the companies dispute the data, these "scores" are all inconclusive and basically horse poop. The only conclusions one can arrive at are within the particular category they do have sufficient data in. And the way they've computed safestat scores in the past I would question all of it until the FMCSA can get its poop in a group.
     
    scottied67 Thanks this.
  6. Hamshoe

    Hamshoe Medium Load Member

    471
    348
    Jan 12, 2008
    Illinois
    0
    So...whats the deal?....is no.1 good or bad on this csa list?
     
  7. wulfman75

    wulfman75 Road Train Member

    2,108
    2,583
    Jul 15, 2010
    Athens, GA
    0
    About as useful as the #### BCS formula!!!!:biggrin_25523:
     
    otherhalftw Thanks this.
  8. Injun

    Injun Road Train Member

    8,501
    9,491
    May 15, 2010
    West o' the Big Crick
    0
    In this case, it doesn't men anything. Swift is at the top of this particular list because it's a countdown by number of power units. If you want to know who of these is "safest" you'll have to do the math yourself. Whoever has the lowest number is "safest."
     
    Texas-Nana Thanks this.
  9. otherhalftw

    otherhalftw R.I.P.

    13,081
    45,332
    Nov 18, 2008
    CA...gold discovery foothills
    0
    OH I get it....like playing Hearts....low score wins, whoever gets 100 loses?:biggrin_25524: :biggrin_2559:
     
  10. Flying Finn

    Flying Finn Heavy Load Member

    972
    557
    Jun 22, 2010
    Ontario, Canada
    0
    There is a Body Cavity Search formula? Ewww.....:biggrin_25524:
     
    wulfman75 and otherhalftw Thank this.
  11. otherhalftw

    otherhalftw R.I.P.

    13,081
    45,332
    Nov 18, 2008
    CA...gold discovery foothills
    0
    Finn(?)....aren't you about Finnished?:biggrin_25525:
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.