You make good points in discussions so don't take this as I am arguing with you. What does roll stability have to do with HOS? I can see that EOBRS might help a company that has alot of trucks and a bunch of different drivers but what about smaller guys(under 10 trucks) for example. Should these smaller guys be forced to pay for EOBRS when it really won't benefit thier operation? Especially since they don't enforce HOS compliance any more than paper. I am just wondering what others think. Again thanks for a good discussion on a costly unhelpful pre-mandate.![]()
Why CSA 2010 and E-Logs are a good thing.
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by Theophilus, Nov 6, 2011.
Page 182 of 243
-
AfterShock, otherhalftw and 7-UP Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
volvodriver01 and otherhalftw Thank this.
-
DOT requires a paper log to be in the truck if the e-log doesn't work. That info has to be checked by safety and entered into the e-log system ASAP.
-
EOBR and E-logs are two different things. E-logs are being pushed by the DOT to record HOS. EOBRs record truck perimeters and have been in trucks for a long time Schneider, Werner, Swift, JB Hunt, US Xpress, and any other company using Qualcomm and Peoplenet like products.
AfterShock Thanks this. -
seems like FMCSA is allowing dangerous, unsafe drivers on the road
volvodriver01 Thanks this. -
csa is a crock of bs.Ive been driving for 12 years.Never had a accident but according to csa Im a bad driver.I hit a deer and get 38 points.Is that what makes me a bad driver?DOT during inspections cant find anything wrong so they make up stuff like bubbles on a pitman arm.No way I could make that up.Only in California.I do not support anything that the government tries to force the industry to d
utlaw truckers? because some drivers refuse to bow down to DOT that makes them criminals.Wakeup! if the government can manipulate drivers whats going to stop them from making up more stuff on the working class
volvodriver01 and AfterShock Thank this. -
AfterShock and 7-UP Thank this.
-
-
I will answer that with another question. So you are saying that one minute you are gung-ho on calling guys for running over their 11 or 70 or even if they speed or use their brakes suddenly or excessivly but if something causes issues and needs trucks and truck drivers then its okay for the same drivers to violate. Why is it that any other day these same drivers would be called unsafe, outlaw and even dangerous for violating these examples but yet when its to help haul stuff for relief then its okay. EITHER ITS UNSAFE AND DANGEROUS OR ITS NOT. Which is it? All I am stating is the regulations can't go both ways. Just goes to prove that truckers aren't as unsafe as they make it seem.
AfterShock and otherhalftw Thank this. -
volvodriver01 Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 182 of 243