Do you feel elogs should be mandatory or optional?

Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by EZX1100, Oct 23, 2012.

  1. Autocar

    Autocar Road Train Member

    3,167
    2,358
    Apr 28, 2012
    The Hot Rod Shop Oxford, AL
    0
    Last word I got from a reliable source is that trucks with mechanical engines will not be exempt. So they will either be obsolete, or relegated to intrastate only operations, as FMCSA has no authority over intrastate, unless someone developes an E-log that meets specs for mechanicals.
     
    DrtyDiesel Thanks this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. crb

    crb Road Train Member

    1,676
    1,374
    Dec 1, 2009
    USA
    0
    Nope I m good. People welcome it with open arms, it is no wonder to me why we are where we are!
     
  4. DrtyDiesel

    DrtyDiesel Road Train Member

    5,348
    2,598
    Feb 14, 2010
    Jacksonville, FL
    0
    You think they could make an elog that goes off of GPS location only. As in, you move more than "x" amount of yards or meters and it puts you on line 3 instead of going off of engine ECM readings? I'm sure someone could make the tech to do it, there are a pot of guys running mechanicals that will be out of business if they have to buy a new truck I'm sure.

    Ethan
     
  5. Autocar

    Autocar Road Train Member

    3,167
    2,358
    Apr 28, 2012
    The Hot Rod Shop Oxford, AL
    0
    Actually, they can. It happens all the time, in different industries. Do you think a DC-3, that is still in commercial service, is still running the same avionics as back in the 1930s and 1940s, when they were first built?
     
    DrtyDiesel Thanks this.
  6. DrtyDiesel

    DrtyDiesel Road Train Member

    5,348
    2,598
    Feb 14, 2010
    Jacksonville, FL
    0
    That's a good point.

    Ethan
     
  7. jgremlin

    jgremlin Heavy Load Member

    867
    497
    Apr 21, 2010
    SW Michigan
    0
    So essentially you're saying you won't work in an industry that requires EOBR's because they prevent you from operating illegally. If you think you're helping your cause by posting this on a public forum, you're wrong.
     
    Autocar, DrtyDiesel and peterd Thank this.
  8. jgremlin

    jgremlin Heavy Load Member

    867
    497
    Apr 21, 2010
    SW Michigan
    0
    Please explain exactly how voicing an opinion in this thread will prevent the creation of regulation. Its an internet forum. It has about as much power to change government regulation decisions as a goldfish has on the path of a hurricane.
     
    Autocar and DrtyDiesel Thank this.
  9. jgremlin

    jgremlin Heavy Load Member

    867
    497
    Apr 21, 2010
    SW Michigan
    0
    This is true. But I don't believe there are any DC3's in use in commercial passenger service in this country. Freight ops, yeah. But not scheduled passenger. And that point is significant because the FAA requires equipment for aircraft used for scheduled passenger service that is not required for freight ops or 'on demand' passenger ops. So yeah there are very few DC3's operating with the same avionics as when they were first built, but there also very few (probably none?) that could be used for scheduled passenger service in this country and the cost to retro fit the required equipment for those ops has a lot to do with that.
     
  10. volvodriver01

    volvodriver01 Road Train Member

    I will long be retired by the time they try to force old the mechanical trucks off interstate travel. Looking at 20 years before something like that would take place. Unless the government does a "cash for clunkers" type deal with older trucks and give oh I don't know lets say $30,000 for each truck and give grants so owners can go and buy new trucks. Like I said there is way to much involved that will not allow an industry wide mandate.
     
  11. EZX1100

    EZX1100 Road Train Member

    4,017
    5,711
    Aug 18, 2012
    0
    its not about voicing opinion, its about having a desire to have common ground results

    that takes communication, whether it is paul revere shouting "the british are coming" or the arab spring sending out twitter messages and creating a revolution, this forum is a form of communication for truck drivers,

    nothing can be accomplished if the leaders are not of like mind, whether that is a congressional meeting or an internet forum, communication and a desire to achieve results is the first ingredient

    years ago, everyone listened to the radio, and orson welles war of the world created havoc, solely because people were tuned in to a radio program and that too was communication

    so if you are here to needlessly vent, then you are right, its a waste of time

    but if you are here to communicate and share ideas and approaches to your fellow drivers, this is only a beginning of what needs to be done

    and unfortunately, we see nothing eye-to-eye

    NOTHING

    because even if we had a leader, half of us would hate him/her, the other half would love him
    some say we need to strike, i personally think that is the worst thing we can do, because of the political climate and the fact that 90% of the drivers would be against the strike and what would be the aims of the strike, and who is the leader?

    whatever solution we come up with, the majority is against it, so whats the purpose?

    my purpose for even joining this forum was to see what other truck drivers are thinking and sadly, it is nothing but a repeat of what you hear at truckstops, confusion and disorganization

    so how can we push any government regulation in any direction when we cant agree on the problem, much less the solution?
     
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.