Big Loads - Post Photos Number 2

Discussion in 'Heavy Haul Trucking Forum' started by truckdad, Aug 3, 2015.

  1. Big Don

    Big Don "Old Fart"

    17,996
    35,643
    Sep 8, 2007
    Utah's DIXIE!
    0
    DIVE! DIVE! DIVE! Come to periscope depth and level off. . .:D
     
    peterbilt_2005 Thanks this.
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Heavy Hammer

    Heavy Hammer Road Train Member

    1,184
    5,889
    May 1, 2013
    In purgatory
    0
    That's funny Don, in more ways than you know...


    Kinda like truckin & everything else I venture into in life, I tend to overdo it...
    image.jpg
    So please don't tempt me, I could really use a vaca about now...
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2015
  4. Big Don

    Big Don "Old Fart"

    17,996
    35,643
    Sep 8, 2007
    Utah's DIXIE!
    0
    Many tanks there HH!:biggrin_2559:
     
  5. cnsper

    cnsper Road Train Member

    5,869
    27,421
    Feb 28, 2014
    0
    Believe it or not, this little sucker scaled out at over 85k.. Not supposed to be that heavy.... LOL I was over 132k gross on this one.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. nate980

    nate980 Road Train Member

    2,020
    5,225
    Dec 23, 2010
    Langley BC
    0
  7. truckdad

    truckdad Road Train Member

    2,026
    16,681
    Dec 14, 2014
    Penn Valley, CA
    0
    These were taken less than 30 years ago so I guess they dont have to go the "Views of the Past" . D155 on the Murray 7 axle. Machine was 98K or close to it. As mentioned in one of my earlier posts, these CA 7 axle units were easily broken down into a 5 axle setup (10 minutes) & could still permit 44 tons on 5. But the 20'6" deck made it tough to get the real heavy stuff legal on 7 as you had to move it way forward "up the neck" as we used to say to make weight. The dozers were easy as the center of the tracks were right about 8'6" wide. The excavators such as the EX550s were close to 13-6 wide & the track centers were well beyond 8-6. I finally built a pair of "stirrups" if you will, that gave me a 12' wide platform to climb the neck easily. More on these later. scan0130.jpg scan0129.jpg
     
  8. truckdad

    truckdad Road Train Member

    2,026
    16,681
    Dec 14, 2014
    Penn Valley, CA
    0
    Heres the "stirrups" I was refering to.. The 2 center frame rails on this trailer were twice the thickness of the outer rails. These I beams, about 4' long had a hook that slid under the upper outer flange of the center rail & rested on top of the outer rail. Total width was 11'11". I would load the machine, insert the 240Lb. beams, then climb over them up the neck til weight was right. Then placing the bucket over the king pin area of the gooseneck, lift the tracks 1' above the beams & place a hardwood block on the beam to get clearance above jeeps tires. Done. These pics are 2 different machines, not sure why I was using the outriggers on one, the beams needed no additional support. This was way more stable than climbing blocks that were just set on the deck. When I got the 10' wide 9 axle, my job got a LOT easier.. Surprised Murray or Cozad didnt think of this............. scan0131.jpg scan0132.jpg
     
  9. nate980

    nate980 Road Train Member

    2,020
    5,225
    Dec 23, 2010
    Langley BC
    0
  10. Rontonio

    Rontonio Road Train Member

    6,270
    45,633
    Aug 9, 2009
    0
    I see your 329 and raise you a 336 with some weird attachment

    92k image.jpg
     
  11. nate980

    nate980 Road Train Member

    2,020
    5,225
    Dec 23, 2010
    Langley BC
    0
    Portable screener

    [​IMG]
     
    catalinaflyer and skootertrashr6 Thank this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.