The other reason we have hos. Its just like why we have osha, to prevent abuse of employees by employers. Without hos regulations we would see widespread abuse of drivers. Basically the majority would be in the position of run 20 hours a day or get fired.
We need hos regs. That's not debatable. What is debatable is the specific regulations. The 14 hour clock just sucks. Pretty sure we all agree on that. But the biggest problem I think is how inflexible it is. At the minimum we should have the ability to pause it for a few hours.
Effects of the ELD
Discussion in 'ELD Forum | Questions, Answers and Reviews' started by bigmotor1212, Jun 1, 2016.
Page 11 of 15
-
sourdiesel, Lone Ranger 13, Bean Jr. and 3 others Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Big_D409, roshea and rocknroll81 Thank this.
-
spyder7723 Thanks this.
-
The same argument was used 50+ years ago when they started with driving under the influence laws. It has been well established that operating a motor vehicle is not a constitutional right. It is a privilege that can and will be revoked.roshea, rocknroll81 and inkscale Thank this. -
We did 18 and 20 hours of trucking daily all the time pulling hoppers from the corn fields to the elevators a few years ago up in Illinois. In many states there are no limitations on hours you can work intrastate agriculture. No-one got hurt. Happens all the time in many agricultural states. And you are driving around these people and probably don't even know it. That probably makes a lot of elogging weasles here squirm but putting in hours like that is nothing out of the ordinary. Sure everyone needs a break from it eventually to rest up. Common sense applies.
double yellow, Big John Classic HQ, Big_D409 and 9 others Thank this. -
I think we've all seen drivers driving too fast for conditions. How many are doing that to get somewhere before their time runs out on the elog.
On paper logs , if you run into bad weather or traffic etc, slow down and be safe and then log it like you didn't run into a problem. So, yeah, you broke the law by driving an extra 20-30 minutes and nobody knew.
But you did it safely.
Now you have drivers playing beat the clock.
I do believe we need hos rules, but I do hate the 14 hour rule. I think I would be reasonably satisfied if we could go back to the more flexible split break .
My problem : sometimes I like to take a nap and for me an effective nap is 3 hours. I usually don't have time for
that with the 14 hour rule.
I miss being able to take a nap and waking up with the same number of hours available as I had when I went to the bunk.
I think the 14 hour rule discourages stopping for a nap.
As a matter of fact , the driver is penalized by losing some of that days driving hours because he stopped to
take a break.
The 14 hour rule can actually encourage a driver to continue driving even though he's tired because that's when the government says he can legally drive.
I don't actually have an issue with elogs. I just want to have the flexibility to make intelligent , practical choices on when to drive or not drive. Currently, the emphasis is on hos compliance while ignoring most everything else.Big John Classic HQ, Al. Roper, ShooterK2 and 9 others Thank this. -
Like you said, the elog isn't the problem. The problem is the current inflexible hos regs. Hopefully when the law is in effect and highway safety doesn't improve, as we all know it won't, then we can move the conversation along to fixing the hos regs.roshea Thanks this. -
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 11 of 15