If I can't trust an adult who has a valid license to carry because I am afraid they may respond improperly and I get sued, I would never have put him in a truck of mine. The odds of a fatality collision (not accident as they don't exist) resulting in a lawsuit are far higher regardless of who is at fault. I will ALWAYS support the Constitutional rights of my employees.
I guess I will put this here since their is not a fleet owners sections,
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by KANSAS TRANSIT, Apr 10, 2018.
Page 7 of 11
-
ChaoSS, PoleCrusher, spyder7723 and 4 others Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Source?Cottonmouth85, nightgunner and spyder7723 Thank this. -
Heck, I bet he even took the extra effort and asked at two different truck stops to be absolutely sure....Sirscrapntruckalot, Cottonmouth85, nightgunner and 1 other person Thank this. -
Pedigreed Bulldog, nightgunner and spyder7723 Thank this.
-
Since when is it so bad to ask for an opinion or and idea that someone here may have already have exp. with,,, sure wish I knew everything about everything!Sirscrapntruckalot, Cottonmouth85, PoleCrusher and 5 others Thank this. -
It is the same thing. -
And yes, in some jurisdictions if you as a business owner disarm law-abiding citizens by posting a "no guns" sign, you accept liability for their safety while on your property. If a criminal does what criminals do and that disarmed licensee gets injured, you would be liable.
Business with 'gun-free zone' signs may be tagged with legal liability
Hell, there are efforts in some states to not only hold you liable for disarming the law-abiding, but to INCREASE your liability for doing so!
Legislator seeks triple damages for businesses that ban guns
Still afraid of that big bad law suit? It's coming either way. Which would you rather defend against? Family of a thug after your employee protects himself? Or the family of your employee after your employee is harmed by a thug?ChaoSS, nightgunner, Sublime and 1 other person Thank this. -
You well know it's impossible to prove a negative, and by asking for proof of a negative you have already shown you have no interest in the debate. You simply want to justify you prefer your employees, err, sorry.. Independent contractors to get shot instead of the criminal attacking them.
Again, provide proof that an independent contractor working shot someone and that someone or his family sued the business owner he was working at. You can't have it both ways, they either work for you and thus increase your liability or they do not and you have no liability.ChaoSS Thanks this. -
@ZVar and @Pedigreed Bulldog - look at edgewater motels v gatzkel
Or read up on the idea of respondant superior/vicarious liability. -
KANSAS TRANSIT Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 7 of 11