Cascadias with dd13 and dd15 mpg

Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by pavrom, Dec 16, 2018.

  1. TylerVS

    TylerVS Light Load Member

    102
    170
    Nov 11, 2012
    Sully, IA
    0
    I’m surprised no one has asked about the op engine. Do you have a glider or did you mean c-15?
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. pavrom

    pavrom Road Train Member

    3,182
    7,295
    Apr 29, 2012
    NE illinois
    0
    Removed blown Cummins and installed c16
     
  4. crocky

    crocky Road Train Member

    1,732
    1,577
    Jun 28, 2017
    0
    I've had 3 Cascadias. A 2017 lightweight with the dd13/auto I used to get mid 8's mpg. Smaller engine but when heavy it strains more. (was new truck)

    2018 Cascadia with dd15/auto my average was 8.5mpg but I drove 60mpg 90% of the time. (New truck)

    2016 Cascadia dd15/10speed I'm getting a average of 7.5mpg. Doesn't seem to matter if I drive 60-65 I have a very hard to e hitting 8mpg like I did with the autos. (439k when I got it)


    I'll say straight up you will not hit 8's running 70mph but when you can save that much money by slowing down if you have the time, isn't it worth it?
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2018
  5. pavrom

    pavrom Road Train Member

    3,182
    7,295
    Apr 29, 2012
    NE illinois
    0
    Surprisingly I slowed down to 60-61 from 68-70 and I got 7.1 no matter what load I was pulling , I did Chicago to Atlanta 26k lbs , haul back 6600lbs and 46k steel Chicago to charlotte nc ...every time over 7mpg wow
     
  6. gekko1323

    gekko1323 Road Train Member

    1,574
    2,633
    Jul 14, 2018
    Henderson, NV
    0
    How does the rear gear ratios affect fuel mileage? Also, what is the difference between 3.25, 3.58 and 2.75? Thanks.
     
  7. uncleal13

    uncleal13 Road Train Member

    3,797
    6,294
    Apr 9, 2009
    Humboldt, Sk
    0
    3.25 and higher , probably an over drive transmission. 2.75 and lower, a direct drive transmission.
    Generally, the lower the ratio, the better the fuel economy with a modern engine. The big factor being how big of a load you hauling on a consistent basis and at what speeds.
     
  8. gekko1323

    gekko1323 Road Train Member

    1,574
    2,633
    Jul 14, 2018
    Henderson, NV
    0
    Generally speaking, I never go past 65. I'm usually around the 62-63 sweet spot. So the lower the gear ratio, the less pulling power?
     
  9. uncleal13

    uncleal13 Road Train Member

    3,797
    6,294
    Apr 9, 2009
    Humboldt, Sk
    0
    They all pull the same if you drop enough gears with the transmission.
    But there is a limit to how low of a ratio you can go and still be able to launch the truck fully loaded on a hill without burning out the clutch. Startability.
    It’s all about compromise.
     
    gekko1323 Thanks this.
  10. D.Tibbitt

    D.Tibbitt Road Train Member

    21,609
    147,332
    Apr 26, 2013
    Gettin' down westbound
    0
    I went from a 9 speed cascadia manual to a dd12 cascadia auto and get the same mpg, maybe even a tad bit better with the manual ..but im in flatbed so fuel mileage always sux i guess
     
    Dave_in_AZ Thanks this.
  11. Dave_in_AZ

    Dave_in_AZ Road Train Member

    56,516
    383,988
    May 4, 2015
    0
    The higher the ratio, the less your mileage is going to be at highway speeds.

    Truck with a higher ratio has to turn more rpms. More rpms means more fuel used.
     
    gekko1323 Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.