Which state has the lowest insurance?

Here is my full statement.


And this is your full statement:

Last I checked this was the land of the free. America is not a "whites only" country. Get your head out of your ### please.

So first you cut my full statement, then you construed a false notion about what I said, and finally you make an inflammatory remark towards me. And I am the one who is spinning? Wow

Moderators... please close this thread. It is getting way too off topic.

 

It is really bad because unless you want Mexico's economy for California. But by all means... if you want Florida tax payers to pay for our bailout thats great!

 

Because there is nothing more you can say.

 

Don't worry, NH is not conservative enough. Besides, I think they are a "blue" state now that many of the "New Hampshirites" are just Mass. transplants.

Care to elaborate how whites in NH are mooching off the system? Last time I checked I couldn't name one social program in that state other than socialized education which every state has now. Isn't your state motto "live free or die"? Maybe this has all changed with all the liberal migration into your state. I can't seem to understand how anybody can leach off the NH system with no state income other than property tax. Care to elaborate on specific programs with specific budget figures?

You state that the local white trash gives the town more trouble than anyone with darker skin moving in ever has. How can this be true with NH crime being one of the lowest in the nation?

Quite frankly I don't believe anything you said would drive me to change my views. You are correct, race itself has nothing to do with crime. It is poverty and lack of opportunity that perpetuates crime. The fact of the matter is that whites tend to have more access to capital and opportunity more than any other race which is why statistically speaking, as a race we constitute the least amount of crime. Asians fair well too.

I think you and the other poster lack the cognitive capacity to understand that my viewpoints are neither extreme nor incorrect. You are asserting that I am judgemental? Last time I checked, I have that God given right.

"Moral of the story: there are losers of each and every race, and the OP needs to change the way he judges people"

Statements such as these, aimed to silence/change those with different opinions says something about where the direction of our country is going... down the path of socialism/communism. I am quite familiar with this system of government, I am a first generation American from Europe. In many ways I hope that we never go down that path. But sometimes I wish it did just so Americans can get a culture shock and understand. The problem is once a country becomes socialist, it can almost never be capitalist again. So be careful.

 

You have no budget figures and you are using your small town as an example representative of the state/country.

I never said you critisized my judgement. You said that I should "change" the way I judge people. This is representative of opression of another individuals viewpoints which is far from being democratic.

Labeling me or my statements as being racist is ludicrous because it assumes that I have descriminatory objectives towards another group of people. You may label me as prejudice because I may harbor ill will towards certain groups of people but this is by no means the advocation of preventing a particular ethnic group or race the "opportunity" to succeed.

I have gathered from your statements that racism is a bad thing. But what I think you fail to understand is that every civilization in history was built on imperialism/colonialism/nation building, the very bypoducts of racism. Every nation that has ceased to embrace these activities have reverted to present day 3rd world countries. So when I listen to people embrace multiculturalism- the theory of promoting retention of various cultural divisions for the sake of diversity that applies to the demographic make-up of a specific place, this can be construed as the birth of "Socialist" ideologies.

You don't live in CA and you can't really understand the invasion that is transpiring here through shear numbers. And it is an invasion- "entrance as if to take possession or overrun". Mexicans as a whole have no intention of assimilation and that is my beef with them. This is also the reason why it can be fairly catagorized as an invasion. White Europeans understood by and whole that the key to success was to respect the "New" rules of the "New" nation to better themselves and their families. They understood that if you assimilate, the native inhabitants of a country will respect and welcome foreigners. This is not the case for the new wave of immigration in this country that commenced from the 70's and consisted of primarily 3rd world countries with the emphasis of labor above innovation, education, and infrastructure.



The history of NH is founded on a libertarian point of view. Fiscally conservative but socially liberal which is basically what philosophy you seem to embrace but I will by no means claim that you are because that is for you to tell me if you so wish. And, yes, NH is a blue state carrying 3 of the four last elections with a Democratic win.

It is possible to have jails and not properly fund them. CA releases criminals every day and shortens term limits simply because we are practically bankrupt. Schools around where I live have cut funding dramatically (I don't think this is a bad thing).

You said that crime, welfare etc. are not racial problems but if you read my post carefully I said that exact same thing. Then you said that they are principle, moral, and ethical problems. Now tell me which races have the most documented crime and which ones have the most principle, moral, and ethical dilemmas?