Definitely. I would have no problem with holding any fiance company liable for the actions of the carrier. I also would make piercing the corporate veil much easier to hold individual investors personally liable.
Who’s in and who’s out?
Discussion in 'Ask An Owner Operator' started by Midwest Trucker, Jul 21, 2025.
Page 16 of 16
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Running the spot market shouldn’t be a business plan.Sons Hero and Deere hunter Thank this. -
Cracking down on employee classification would help also. Instead of enforcing current regulations they’d rather just make everyone be an employee though.Siinman Thanks this. -
I should be clear, there are a heap of English speakers lining up to offer cheap services tooSons Hero, Siinman, Savor the Flavor and 6 others Thank this. -
Need to add one: Retired and gave this crap up. I have 1 foot in this boat.
-
Well, that and a clause that prevents double brokering/sub contracting.
'A Little Bit Frightening': This Legal Obstacle Is Emerging in Trucking Lawsuits - RAM Law
USPS contracted with Carroll Fulmer, a solid company with a solid record - who then brokered out the load to a substandard carrier, who rear ended a vehicle. The driver "had only been on the job a few weeks but had already had multiple crashes, and a police officer’s body cam footage showed Gozibekov [the driver] pleading to not get a ticket". Gozibekov was 'employed' by BJJ Enterprises of St. Louis while the truck was owned by Xpress Line of Chicago.
So how is a driver employed by one company but the truck is owned by a different company? All of whom are contracted by a company that is contracted with the USPS.
If the injured party was allowed to sue all the way up the ladder, there is no way that USPS would allow Carroll Fulmer to broker out their freight. Even if they did, if the driver picked up the load at 12:30 and had 800 miles to delivery, the shipper should automatically reschedule delivery to a time frame possible under the HOS - with whatever penalties to the carrier for not providing a truck with the hours to do the contracted load. Conversely the carrier should be charging an amount that accounts for paying a driver for down time waiting for the load.
Extending my thought - we all know that there are ELD providers that allow for the manipulating of logs and this is okay because ELD providers only have to self certify. If a shipper can be held liable for HOS violations they're going to require the carrier to use a real ELD.NorthEastTrucker, Peplow, Long FLD and 1 other person Thank this. -
The carrier had 400 trucks and 1,700 trailers. Some 600 employees will be laid off as operations cease. The company plans to offer them 60 days’ severance pay as it winds down.
Indeed, a very solid company.Old_n_gray Thanks this. -
Sons Hero, Siinman, Old_n_gray and 3 others Thank this.
-
Deere hunter, D.Tibbitt and 86scotty Thank this.
-
Deere hunter, D.Tibbitt, 86scotty and 4 others Thank this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 16 of 16