Taxes are based upon how much income you make. A tax deduction is something you subtract from that income.
If your company is subtracting the chargeback from your gross income, your income is already being deducted.
You may want to reconfirm that this is how they're doing it. If so, you can't deduct it again.
However, you're still getting the deduction it's coming off the top.
Tax issues....maybe
Discussion in 'Trucker Taxes and Truck Financing' started by dancnoone, Jul 4, 2010.
Page 4 of 5
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
My whole premise is predicated on the way I interpreted the situation based on terminoligy.
i.e. ..... if your gross pay is $1000.00 and, this reflects on your pay stub, then the company deducts $100.00 for over idle expenses (reflected again on your pay stub) and re-adjusts your goss income to $900.00 then, takes appropriate deductions based on the $900.00, what they have done is pay you money then deduct it as an expense before taxing it and, take taxes from the remaininder.
Which, from everything that I've been taught is the only way that you can deduct from someones pay, either pre or post tax. To "deduct" you first have to pay.
Now reducing or docking pay is an entirely different matter.
i.e. If (as an example) company policy is to reduce your pay by "X"% based on a threshold of idle percentage. Then they aren't "deducting" it from your pay. They are actually "recovering an expense" by adjusting your pay scale.
IMO if the first instance is true (you were paid the money on paper and it was deducted) then you would be able to claim it.
In the second instance where the pay was simply re-adjusted to diferent rate then, no you couldn't claim it because you really weren't paid that money at all. You were just penalized based on a certain set of criteria.
.......... Jim -
Sounds to me like you got it!
-
One of the companies that did this in the past was Covenant. This was done as a payroll deduction from the gross wages which reduced the net pay. They did not do a restructure of the pay per mile.
If it was done pretax, then there is no deduction to claim because the income was reduced. After tax, there is a deduction. -
I know you guys are smarter on this than I.
But what about an O/O paying for fuel. Pre Tax.....
I have to fork over part of my pay...pre tax or not. That is a cost that is attributed to my job.
I was not reimbursed these cost. These are charges made to me, by my company. I will reflect this as a payment made directly to my company as part of my job. I would not have incurred these expenses otherwise.
The company recovered the cost of said fuel...therefore THEY are not entitled to the tax write off.
Yes, they may have made the original payment...for the fuel. But they STILL recovered that money.
Pre-Tax or not. You can bet your ### they claimed the IFTA tax benefit. Since they hold the fuel receipt. -
I am not sure what you are meaning here. But as an owner operator everything is pretax so there is no difference.
-
The pre-tax comment relates back to the other poster...I think.
To explain a bit more.
If I pay you $500 to work for me, and allow you to drive my company vehicle.
Then you take said vehicle home or on vacation using my fuel card, and I charge you for the miles and/or fuel. I have recovered ALL my cost/expenses from you.
Do I then deserve to take the tax deduction on the miles driven and the fuel associated with those miles? When I file my taxes. -
Number one. You will still get the operating costs for the truck that was used either way. When you got the money back for the use of the truck, you could have recorded it two ways. One as income or the other as a expense reduction.
The total effect of this situation is a nill entry. -
Okay, we're clear on that. Let's take it a step further.
You idle MY truck for several hours, as a matter of doing your job safely as required by law. And I charge the cost of the fuel back to you.
I have recovered my cost from you. Am I then able to claim that as an expense?
Second, does the employee get to claim it as an expense? Since the law requires (vaguely) that he operate said vehicle safely, while he is in my employ. So he is technically required to spend the money...by law as a matter of his employment.
I could take this in sooooo many directions from here. IE the employer states that the employee was "off duty" while this occurred. Therefor the employer is not responsible for the fuel used. And the employer can recover those cost, from said EMPLOYEE. Yet I require him to answer/respond to my every beck and call...IE QualCom or cell phone. -
The fuel question is the same as the previous.
The employee would get to take the deduction as a employee like the per diem. However, I would not imagine the employee hanging around for long.
You have an active imagination. The employer never loses.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 4 of 5