In South Dakota they like to pick on out of state trucks. And in SD you have to pay the fine (if you get one) before they let you leave. Good times in the Rushmore State.
Ft Supply, OK Police
Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by Injun, Mar 12, 2011.
Page 3 of 10
-
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
Odds are the truck driver doesn"t live in the area and would be less inclined to fight a fine onlt citation. IA does that BS, they write tickets for 90 bucks and no points figuring you'll just pay it and go on with life.outerspacehillbilly Thanks this.
-
To play devils advocate, how do you know the officer had radar or any speed measuring device. Everyone ASSUMES that everytime we stop someone it is for speeding. Here's breaking news, sometimes we don't have radar, laser or vascar in the vehicle. Sometimes.......sometimes.. we stop someone for a light out, following to close, any number of reasons. Cell phone use, seatbelts, mud flaps, bad tires etc. I went all last week without writing a single speeding ticket. Heck, 2 days straight I didn't even turn the radar on.
By the way, what is your statement going to do? You saw a cop turn around and stop another trucker. That will be worth your time to come to court and tell the judge. Here's how it will go.. Injun, did you have a radar unit in the vehicle? "Ah...no" Then how could you tell the truck was going 70 mph? I couldn't. etc...etc...etc..........
Not to bust your nads, but what are you going to add? You have no idea why he stopped the truck. -
Injun doesnt have nads, he is a she. You should have said "Not to bust your ovaries".
-
Dang it!!! I just smarted off to a cop. Will I EVER learn to keep my mouth shut?
-
True. But in basic Police Academy, I received the same radar/speed judgment training you did. If I dig through my old papers, I might even be able to find my radar certification card signed by Dep. W. Hollis.
As observant as any officer can be, how can you tell a light is out in broad daylight while you are travelling at roughly 65mph and you're looking at a truck going roughly 70mph (passing speed 135mph, yeah?) while you are following another truck at two car-lengths' distance and the truck's lights aren't even on? That micro-second of time between seeing the passing vehicle and the brain registering that it's a truck is not enough time to see and recognize, especially with the awkward angle, whether that trucker is or isn't using his eatbelt or yapping on the phone.
Last I was taught, Probable Cause was required in order to initiate a traffic stop. The only PC I could observe was the truck's speed. Remembering, of course, the combined passing speed of the two vehicles being 135mph give-or-take 5mph.
Note to DieselBear and all outside observers: this is not Injun being a deliberate PITA, contentious b****. All of this was written with a twinkle in the eye and a "let's play" mischievous half-smirk on the lips.
Big Don Thanks this. -
No worries, DB. I didn't take it as you busting my chops. It looks like friendly banter to me.
-
Sorry bout the nads. Probable cause is not needed in all State's to do a truck inpsection. So it can be just a random stop. However, it's quite easy to see in a truck to see a seatbelt, depending on the model, attire of the driver, lighting conditons etc. Your right you can not see lights that are not on, but we didn't know what time of the day that you saw this scenario unfold. Like I posted previosly I was playing devil's advocate.Injun Thanks this.
-
####, who knows what will happen?
-
When I was bored I played "lets stop all red trucks today, lets stop all cabovers (which meant all food lion trucks back in the day) NC didn't need PC to stop for a motor carrier inspection..Injun Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 3 of 10