ECOTAZ ECO Fuelsystems Fuel Enhancers - Does it work?

We have done emissions test with the city of San Antonio, Texas, With School Districts, and with Tug Boats at the Houston ship channel. Much of this testing is on our website at www.etieco.com. We have been investigated by the Texas Attorney General by the Chief Investigator for Consumers Affairs, Investigated by the Cheif Counsel for Homeland Security and both agencies found that we did exactly as we say we will. As for Dyno Tests we had one done on a Peterbilt with a 3206 Cat engine with an increase of 12 hpr with Mustang Cat, in Houston, and we did a Tandem Truck with a Cummins engine with 11 hpr increase at Grande Truck Sales in San Antonio. Both of these tests were not cheap as you well know. So I made the deal that If horsepower did not increase, We pay for the test and if it Did they pay for it. Well, They paid for both of them. I will do the same here. We have dyno tests from South Dakota with a New Holland Farm Tractor showing 8 hpr increase They paid for that one also. The Bottom line is you cannot burn fuel more completely without lowering emissions and increasing hpr. If we make a hotter burn, heat transfers to power. The emissions you are blowing out the exhaust right now, as Particulate and Hydrocarbons is unburnt Fuel. It all has to add up otherwise it would not work. I am confident that if you ask Big Bad Bill, and Gerardo about these units they would tell you that these units are well worth the money in just Performance increase alone. I bet niether one of them wants to give it back to me. Both of these testers have in the last 2 weeks saved enough on fuel to have paid for the ECO's they have installed. When these other testers get their numbers it will all be similiar. We only enhance the fuel you are currently using. You enhance the fuel to any engine - it is going to run better.
I would not have givin out ten units to people I have never met if we were not confident in Our Product. I have to only hope that the proffessionals doing the tests here are Fair - Openminded - and compare Apples to Apples. To be able to report the difference in head winds, terrain, conditions and differences in weight of their loads, along with accurate gallons used to miles driven along with less downshifting. So far the two reporting know their business and their trucks very well. I commend them for it! We did not just start this company up, we have been in business for 8 years working mostly in Texas and the Southwest with government agencies and School Districts
So far these 2 gentlemen have proven that at the Fleet price of the ECO's your going to get your money back in 30 days or less if your driving 2500 miles a week. It costs you $438 for a #5 or $329 for a #4 ECO system and in return you have nearly $400 a month or $4,800.00 a year!
$438.00 in trade for $4,800 yearly in your pocket!
If it doesn't work you have 90 days to return from date of Purchase and get 100% refund. You lose nothing. You and your family gain a minimum of 6% of your annual fuel cost. 6% is the least increase that has been reported. Many get more than that. It is a win win for you the owner/ operators with nothing to lose. What can you do with and extra $400 a month or $4800.00 a year? That is a nice income raise at any job!!
Do not forget the Introductory Offer that is good till August 20th
http://www.etieco.com/order-special.htm
Here the members of this Forum can purchase at a LARGER discounted PRICE. Now you get your money back in about 2 weeks.
After August 20th it will be at regular fleet prices again.
ECOTAZ

 

438 miles almost 100% highway, 38K lbs and 7.04 mpg. This is starting out the first 100 or so mile at 5.7 on computer because of heavy winds and some hills. The computer increasing as I went but didn't expect to see 7 when I filled.

 

OK guys, I managed to get fittings for my cummins n14 from a hydraulic shop in town and the fix was pretty easy.
My average before installation was in the range of 6.5 to 7.0, hardly 7.
My first trip with the Fuel enhancer was encouraging. 970 miles with an average of 7.45. Weight of the load mid 35k.
Am impressed with these figures and will keep you guys updated.

 

Thanks JOJO for the info on this first trip of yours.
the difference of your best before of 7 mpg to to 7.45 with the ECO system installed is a difference .0642 which is right at 6 1/2 percent increase in fuel economy. Figuring it BigJohn54's way -- at $3.99 a gallon at best before your cost per mile was 57 cents. Now with the ECO it is at 53.5 cents per mile. / 3 1/2 cents savings per mile. In 2500 miles driven you will save $87.50 a week or $350.00 a month.
$4200 annually increase in Profit.

Were you abel to notice any difference in the performance of you engine or in your shifting patterns in the hills?

Thanks Again.

 

I just had a thought! Our elected officials are always talking about kickstarting our economy and getting retail sales a jump start.
If 10,000 Owner/Operators each saved on average $350.00 a month that would equate to $3,500.000.00 (three million five hundred thousand dollars) a month saved by these 10,000 families. That equates to $42,000,000.00 (forty two million dollars) in a year. That's a lot of money flowing back into the US market.
The saying is true "America Moves Forward because Truckers Keep America Moving".
Thanks and Drive Safely

 

Now get to writing the stimulus plan to the government and see if you can get them for those 10,000 O/O's one for free. Don't forget to calculate the reduced carbon emissions in the plan.

Don't forget to jack the price by at least twice the normal cost or they won't believe you can be a government contractor.

 

Now you thinking like a trucker.
That $42 000 000-00 is already flowing in to the US market.
Okay in to big oil's pocket from Joe the O/O's pocket.
The rich get richer.
Time to get me a slice of that action.

 

LOL! Wonder why our government lost it's credit rating?

 

Next Tankstop,898 Miles,141,065 Gallons,6,365mpg,Weather was Windy ,and after I change my fuelfilter(was dirty)From the bad fiel,now engine runs nice

 

ok I got the unit. Looks very easy to install you dont have to be a mechanical guru. I just hope the fittings are the same. I have detailed records hand calculated mpg's on every fillup the past 150,000 miles. I'll install it and run several weeks then post up new numbers. I run irregular routes typically 75-80k gvw.