Precisely. My husband works for a local company that now runs 150 trucks, and has only 2 dispatchers. One of them not only dispatches, but runs safety.
My husband's trailer burned on Easter Sunday. Dispatch was on the phone with me, while the trailer was still burning! He called me!
The other dispatcher came to my rescue when my car broke down, leaving me stranded in BFE. ME. Not my husband. ME. I'm just a driver's wife by most company's standards. At this company, I am seen as part of the team, and treated like I really matter.
Injured in a truck accident
Discussion in 'Report A BAD Trucking Company Here' started by mommywing, Apr 13, 2012.
Page 6 of 9
-
123456, NDBADLANDS, Numb and 1 other person Thank this.
-
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
-
I thought the part about the husband driving the CRST truck to a safe-haven without a valid CDL license w/o a qualified driver present and crst making a big stink about it regardless the circumstances was perfectly inline per company response. I was almost fired once for logging in to corporate email while off the clock on a weekend. I thought that was ridicoulus and got reamed, threatened ove rmy job with wage and hour law crapola...
Companys dont play these days. And they sure wont be your mother looking out for you missing buses and such. It is what it is out there in employment world these days. Corporations want to be flattered and spoke highly of by employees even if they are sticking it to them. At the same time they are on guard for employees exploiting retaliation that can cost them, justified or not.
That is also the reason of the no sympathy, or empathy factor. Companys dont know if an employee is gunning for them as a casualty, and in turn the communication of an incident can increase liability. I learned in my previous field where much liability is at stake the best response was never yes or no. It was always best to use the "cant recall" response. Telling a medical insurance adjuster one is fine after a big accident falls into that reasoning.
Once more-
One has to accept the outcome, and risk associated with breaking State and Federal Laws and suffer those consequences.
That scenario also carries into anticipating the consequences of a voluntary choice that could predicate lifes precarious outcomes. HUH? unfortunately i am sober folks HA!
Im still learning too... So not to come across as a know it all ###...
Just throwing out a mans perspective. I arrived after thought i saw somehthing about "women and exposing" in a sentance and it set off my man alarm...Something else I guess we men are faulted on...
Thats allscottied67 Thanks this. -
I can understand corporations not holding your hand. I take full responsibility for my own actions. I'm just pointing out exactly what I see as the reason for not giving the trainer any protest until she got back to the base yard.
-
-
so let me get this straight after all of that "research" you still went with crst
-
GuysLady Thanks this.
-
sevenmph Thanks this. -
jlkklj777 Thanks this.
-
Well, if she is "fishing", one just jumped in the boat.
-
But no she stays with him a few more days to be tormented moreAflak Thanks this.
Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds
Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.
Page 6 of 9