Extension of time period for comments on SMS

Discussion in 'Trucking Industry Regulations' started by Tazz, May 27, 2012.

  1. Tazz

    Tazz Road Train Member

    2,821
    1,133
    Oct 25, 2009
    Lynchburg,Tn
    0
    Oh I would say no one is gonna get an audit over a light, and that is the maximum net result of any points. Now if a company a light out every time they recieve an inspection I for one would want them looked into. Consistent infractions indicate lax behavior and habits.
     
  2. Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.

  3. Tazz

    Tazz Road Train Member

    2,821
    1,133
    Oct 25, 2009
    Lynchburg,Tn
    0
    Where to start?


    Okie Dokie.

    Have a nice day.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2012
  4. Stump

    Stump Heavy Load Member

    769
    663
    Jan 27, 2009
    Modesto CA
    0
    CSA is a joke. The FMCSA has taken the constitution, threw it out the window and let the FMCSA and the LEO'S be the Judge, Jury and Executioner when you are issued a warning ticket that you cannot fight in a Court of law. But Tazz, i get the feeling you agree with this? Like you say, Okie Dokie, have a nice day.

    I hope i'am wrong.
     
  5. Tazz

    Tazz Road Train Member

    2,821
    1,133
    Oct 25, 2009
    Lynchburg,Tn
    0
    You are correct I have no problem with a record of a drivers or carriers failures being recorded in a data base to highlight them for safety audits. No problem with that whatsoever.

    I fail to see how keeping track of someones record could possibly be unconstitutional. I am sure you like others have a myriad of theories like due process, the fourth and fifth amendments and the like. None of those apply because this is not a criminal or prosecution.There is no Judge or Jury because of that very simple fact. The net result of any SMS results for a carrier as far as the government is concerned is an audit.

    Now the point of the thread is the FMCSA is asking the public what if any changes they would see made, and or general comments on the changes coming to the SMS methodology, like more than one person's contention warnings should not count as equal to a citation. If you feel that way post your thoughts on the matter. I would suggest making clear concise points pertaining to your belief inspections with only non-cited infractions(warnings or fix it tickets) should not be used, or at least weighted as less than a cited infraction.

    Meaningless tirades about the state of the industry, your understanding of the USC, or equally pointless comments will most likely be disregarded.
     
  6. PackRatTDI

    PackRatTDI Licensed to Ill

    14,765
    22,568
    Jul 15, 2006
    El Chuco, Tejas
    0
    "thank you sir may i have another! Thank you sir may i have another!"
     
  7. Stump

    Stump Heavy Load Member

    769
    663
    Jan 27, 2009
    Modesto CA
    0
    What i posted is one of many problems i see. My point is you think its ok to not have a right to fight a warning ticket, when it goes aginst your CSA record? This is one of many problems with CSA, SMS, and all other new regulations and laws. I don't waste to much time discussing transportation issues with someone that has to act pompus on a internet fourm, and seems to have a "Above all" attitude. I get a better response sending my thoughts to Barbara Boxer to help stop this nonsense in our industrie.

    We all get it Tazz, you seem to be a very inteligent person, but some of your post very derogatory.
     
  8. Tazz

    Tazz Road Train Member

    2,821
    1,133
    Oct 25, 2009
    Lynchburg,Tn
    0
    I am confused by you people. How is posting a link to effect change in a program you people have issues with, and offering advice on submitting comments derogatory?

    I find most people very odd and unwilling to think I will admit, but my advice was solid despite that fact. Submit comments or don't, most would rather have some boogey man to complain about than work towards addressing problems they see I guess.
     
  9. revelation1911

    revelation1911 Heavy Load Member

    923
    308
    Dec 25, 2011
    Moody Alabama
    0
    Here's some advice why don't you go get your own authority and see how it is? All this dribble you post is just parroting what we can all read on the lahood channel. Have you ever heard of unfair terms in a contract? It's been argued before, like in the broker contracts with hold harmless clauses. Thats about the same way with getting authority, to be able to haul you are forced to agree to unfair terms making all your lahood parroting worthless and BS.
    Use your thought process for something worthwhile.
     
  10. Tazz

    Tazz Road Train Member

    2,821
    1,133
    Oct 25, 2009
    Lynchburg,Tn
    0
    You do understand that Ray LaHood is just a figure head appointee right?

    Nah never mind I forgot your life is based on fallacy , fraud, and delusion.

    Okie Dokie

    Have a nice day.
     
  11. revelation1911

    revelation1911 Heavy Load Member

    923
    308
    Dec 25, 2011
    Moody Alabama
    0
    Do you play with your sock puppet as you drive? Anything I've seen you post only parrots the fmsca site why not just post links?
    I know it has to be hard typing with socks on your hands. You might find more who aggree with you over at the US gov employee's website.
    I can at least have independent thoughts, you always present yourself as this superior thinking person? whats superior to parroting goverenment BS?
    Maybe better received in europe or somewhere like that.
     
    Stump Thanks this.
  • Truckers Report Jobs

    Trucking Jobs in 30 seconds

    Every month 400 people find a job with the help of TruckersReport.